DEMPSTER

DEMPSTER, THOMAS, one of the most learned men whom Scotland has produced, was born at Cliftbog in Aberdeenshire, on the 23d of August 1579, being the twenty-fourth out of twenty-nine children by the same mother. His father, who bore the same name with himself, he describes as proprietor of Muresk, Auchterless, and Killesmont, and prorex, or lieutenant, of the county of Banff and the district of Buchan. His mother was Jane, the sister of Lesley of Balquhain; and one grandmother was daughter to the last earl of Buchan of the family of Stewart, and the other was sister to Lord Forbes. He was born during the lifetime of his grandfather, at whose decease, the family, more distinguished by its gentility than its opulence, was left in very unprosperous circumstances.

According to his own account, his first step in learning was as wonderful as any part of his subsequent progress; for, at the age of three years, he completely mastered the alphabet in the space of a single hour. He was afterwards committed to the care of Andrew Ogston, a schoolmaster at Turreff, and was next removed to Aberdeen, where he was initiated in classical learning by Thomas Cargill, an excellent grammarian. In the mean time, the family was involved in ruin, chiefly by the misconduct of James, his eldest brother; of whom he has given an account which it would have been much wiser to suppress. This brother took the extraordinary step of marrying his father's concubine, Isabella Gordon of Achavach; and having consequently been disinherited, he attempted to revenge himself by collecting a band of Gordons, and making a violent assault upon his father when he was one morning proceeding on horseback, with the view of transacting some public business. Several attendants of the latter were slain in this encounter, and, amongst others, his brother-in-law Gilbert Lesley; he was himself dangerously wounded. Two of the Gordons were likewise left dead on the field, and several were wounded on both sides. In order to cut off all hope of succession from such an heir, he sold to the earl of Errol his estate of Muresk, situated in the county of Aberdeen; but the bargain was never fulfilled by the other party, and he was unable to recover either his lands or their price. Thus, we are told, he only left to his son Thomas an empty title. But Thomas, who represents himself as the twenty-fourth child, does not venture to assert that, if the estate had still remained in the family, he was next in the order of succession; and when in various works he styled himself baron of Muresk, he must have been aware, even taking baron in the sense of laird, that his title was as empty as could well be imagined. After this act of atrocious violence, his brother James fled to the northern islands, and having there collected a band of ruffians, he lived in open defiance of the laws, till he at length set fire to the bishop of Orkney's palace, and then returned to the country which he had been compelled to abandon. His wife, who had become the mother of seven children, was now discarded; and having made choice of another companion, he sought an asylum in the Netherlands, where

Dempster, he served as a captain of horse. But the divine vengeance at last overtook him; for having been guilty of some gross act of violence towards his colonel, he was executed at Utrecht in the most appalling manner; he was torn limb from limb by four horses, and thus, according to his brother's account, ended a career of more than common crime and infamy.

In the progress of these events, Thomas, by the advice of his uncle John Dempster, whom he describes as an eminent lawyer of Edinburgh, was induced to seek in another country that fortune from which he seemed to be precluded in his own. In the tenth year of his age, he repaired to Cambridge, where he for some time studied in Pembroke Hall. He afterwards directed his course to France; and having on his journey been robbed of his money and strip of his clothes, he with difficulty made his way to Paris. Here he was kindly treated by some of his countrymen, and was beginning to think of resuming his studies, when he was seized with a contagious disease, which deprived the schools of their auditors, and the city of its inhabitants. When he at length recovered from this dangerous malady, he hastened to the university of Louvain, which was then adorned by the erudition of Lipsius, but not long after his arrival he found that William Crichton, a Jesuit, principal of the Scottish College, had received instructions to send some of his young countrymen to Rome; and those whom he selected, besides Dempster himself, were Patrick Anderson, who was already a Jesuit, Robert Hill, who died professor of philosophy at Montpellier, and Thomas Lyon, who was blind from his infancy. He reached the papal city after a dangerous journey, for the plague was raging in Germany, and Italy was the scene of military operations. By the kindness of Cardinal Cajetano, protector of the Scottish nation, he was admitted as a student in the Roman seminary, and, under the tuition of Stephoni, began the study of poetry, that is, the art of Latin versification; but having again been attacked by a dangerous disease, the physicians recommended a change of climate; and, in company with Andrew Crichton, proceeding by way of Switzerland, he directed his wandering steps towards the Netherlands. At Tournay he experienced the kindness of his countryman James Cheyne, who sent him to the university of Douay, where he was maintained by a pension from the king of Spain and the archduke Albert. He now prosecuted the study of poetry with new vigour, but did not neglect the other branches of learning. In poetry he obtained the first, and in philosophy the second prize. Having taken the degree of A. M. he for a short time taught humanity at Tournay; but as his prospects were not there very encouraging, he again presented himself at Paris, and having taken the degree of doctor of the canon law, he succeeded David Sinclair as a regent in the College of Navarre. At that period, according to his own statement, he had not attained the age of seventeen; and he must therefore have obtained his preferment in the year 1596. In what university he afterwards took the degree of doctor of the civil law, he has omitted to mention; but in several of his works he describes himself as Juris utriusque Doctor, or doctor of both laws, civil and canon.

From the beginning to the end of his career he was a restless wanderer, and he soon quitted Paris with the intention of settling at Toulouse. On his route, he halted for some time at St Maixant in Poitou. At Toulouse he

began to teach humanity; but his zeal in contending for Dempster the interests of the university excited the resentment of certain individuals of rank or influence, and he again thought it expedient to change his place of residence. His views were next directed to a professorship of philosophy at Montpellier, whither he appears to have been invited by his countrymen Adam Abernethy and Andrew Currie, the former of whom is still remembered as an author; but, in the mean time, he made his appearance at Nismes, where the professorship of eloquence was to be awarded to the most deserving competitor, and where only one of twenty-four judges decided against him. As this was a seminary appropriated to the Huguenots, Bayle conjectures that he must have suspended his zeal for the Romish faith.¹ One of the unsuccessful candidates, Jacob Grasser of Basel, sought to avenge himself by making a violent assault upon Dempster, by publishing a libel against him, and by applying for a legal interdict to prohibit him from discharging the duties of his office; but the professor, who possessed courage as well as strength, repelled the joint attack of Grasser and some of his associates, and found means to have him committed to prison, first at Nismes, and afterwards, when he had made his escape, at Montpellier, and again at Paris. After a tedious litigation of two years, the cause was at length decided in his favour by the parliament of Toulouse, and the libel published against him was ordered to be burnt at Nismes by the hands of the executioner.

Nor did he long retain his professorship of eloquence. After making a journey into Spain, he accepted the appointment of preceptor to Artus d'Espinay, subsequently bishop of Marseille, a son of the famous Sainte Luc, grand-master of the artillery of France, who was killed at the siege of Amiens in the year 1597. But a quarrel in which he involved himself at Brissac with one of his pupil's relations, hastened the termination of this engagement, and he now adopted the resolution of returning to his native country. With the view of recovering some portion of the family property, he brought an action in the court of session, and, according to his own impression, would ultimately have succeeded, if he had not found it expedient to withdraw before the decision was pronounced. His relations were either reduced to poverty, or were unwilling to assist him, on account of his adherence to the popish faith; and for the same reason he was exposed to persecution from the Scottish clergy, chiefly, as he conceives, at the instigation of William Cowper, afterwards bishop of Galloway. With this divine he was for three days engaged in a theological disputation at Perth, and he appears to have been extremely well satisfied with the manner in which he acquitted himself. To the resentment of Cowper in being foiled, not by a theologian, but by a lawyer, he imputes the injurious representations which were made to the king.² He again bad adieu to Scotland, and, returning to Paris, was for seven years employed, with honour as well as emolument, as a regent in four different colleges, those of Lisieux, Grassins, Du Plessis, and Beauvais.³

Of the decision and ferocity of his character he exhibited a notable instance in the last of these colleges. Gran-gier, the principal, having occasion to absent himself from Paris, appointed Dempster to act as his substitute, being no doubt persuaded that he had sufficient energy to maintain the most rigid discipline. A student challenged one

Dempster, of his companions to fight a duel: the vice-principal was moved with indignation at such a proceeding; and having seized the offender and untrussed his points, he placed him on the back of a sturdy knave, and, in the presence of the whole college, gave him a sound flogging. The young gentleman, burning with resentment, brought one day to the college three of his kinsmen who served in the guards; but Dempster, undismayed at this military invasion, put arms into the hands of the servants, and having ordered them to kill the horses which were left at the gate, made so formidable an attack on the soldiers, that they were speedily reduced to the necessity of begging for mercy. Their lives were spared by the victor, who however detained them for a short time as prisoners in the college belfry. When they had thus ascertained that he was a match for them at their own weapons, they endeavoured to find a more competent remedy; and as he was not persuaded that a legal enquiry into his proceedings would tend to his advantage, he quitted his station in the College of Beauvais, and sailed for England.¹ According to one of his Irish antagonists, the cause of his flight was of a much more foul description;² but the work which contains this statement displays such a fierce spirit of detraction, as must deprive it of all historical credit. He had been invited to England by King James, who bestowed upon him the title of historiographer royal, and made him a present of two hundred pounds, which at that period was no inconsiderable sum. This gift he received in the thirteenth year of the king's reign, namely, in 1615 or 1616.³ At London he married Susannah Waller, a woman of great beauty and elegance, who afterwards proved a very precarious acquisition. His hopes of obtaining preferment were defeated by the remonstrances of the clergy, particularly Dr Montague, bishop of Bath and Wells: they endeavoured to impress the king with a sense of the impropriety of thus taking under his protection, and into his favour, a known and zealous catholic. He therefore took his leave of the learned monarch, and again directed his course towards Italy. When he arrived at Rome, he was suspected of being a spy, and for a single night was detained in custody; but his character and pretensions were easily ascertained, and from the pope and several cardinals he obtained letters of recommendation to the grand duke of Tuscany, Cosmo II. Being likewise befriended by Guicciardini, the duke's ambassador at the court of Rome, he proceeded to Florence, and in the year 1616 was appointed professor of the Pandects in the university of Pisa.⁴ He had previously distinguished himself by the publication of various works in prose and verse, and had earned the reputation of extensive erudition. At an early period of his life he had betaken himself to the study of the law; and by his edition of the Antiquitates Romanae of Rosinus, printed in the year 1613, he had evinced his proficiency as a civilian. The study of the Roman law is so closely blended with the study of Roman history and antiquities, that the one cannot be safely disjoined from the other.

Soon after he had been admitted to this office, he was furnished with letters and money by the grand duke, and returned to England for the purpose of conveying his wife to Italy. They proceeded by way of Paris; and when

they were one day walking in the street, his lady attracted Dempster, ed a crowd of gazers, not merely by the beauty of her person, but chiefly by exhibiting a more ample portion of her bosom and shoulders than suited the established usages of the country. So great was the concourse of people, that they were obliged to fly for shelter to an adjoining house.⁵ In due time he returned to Pisa, and read his inaugural lecture on the second of November. His salary was augmented to four hundred ducats, and he now appeared to have a fair prospect of honour and emolument. He recommended himself to the duke by undertaking his great work De Etruria Regali, which he must have completed with wonderful energy and dispatch. In the year 1617, he paid another visit to Britain, with the view of arranging some private affairs. But his restless and turbulent disposition did not long permit him to enjoy tranquillity. He involved himself in an angry and pertinacious dispute with an Englishman, whose name he has not thought proper to mention, nor is the origin or progress of this dispute rendered in any degree intelligible by his abrupt narrative. It however appears that his antagonist, who was probably an ecclesiastic, succeeded in producing a favourable impression on the grand duke, who only left Dempster the alternative of making an apology or quitting the Tuscan dominions. The learned civilian was of too stubborn a nature to be readily convinced that he was in the wrong, and too proud to stoop to what he considered as an unworthy compliance: he accordingly accepted the latter part of this alternative, and took his departure from Pisa on the 21st of July 1619.

Disgusted with Italy, he now reverted to the plan of settling in his native country; but on arriving at Bologna, he paid his respects to Cardinal Capponi, legate of that papal city, who prevailed upon him to abandon his intention, and within the short space of twelve days procured him the appointment of professor of humanity. This was an honourable and a lucrative office, which had been held by men of high reputation, by P. Manutius, Sigonius, and Robortellus. A new office naturally involved such a person in new contentions: the professor of humanity was entitled to take precedence of other professors; and as this place of honour was fiercely contested, he maintained his own rights with his usual pertinacity, and with more than his usual success.

More serious evils awaited him. The Englishman who had interrupted his tranquillity at Pisa, still infested him at Bologna: he accused the professor of being a catholic of dubious faith, and of being guilty of the crime of having heretical books in his library. Dempster addressed to his adversary a letter, which appears to have been so intemperate as to incur the censure of some of the cardinals; but he proceeded to Rome in person, and after obtaining more than one audience of the pope, was enabled to remove any aspersions which had been aimed at his character. A formal reconciliation was at length effected between these pertinacious antagonists, but the spirit of reconciliation was probably wanting in both parties. The professor mentions that he had prepared a full statement of his case, and that if his adversary recurred to his former practices, it should be transmitted to posterity. In the mean time, he discharged his duty in the university

Dempster, with diligence and ability. His reputation attracted pupils of a higher rank, and his salary was augmented to eight hundred crowns. His love of wandering seems at length to have abated; for he declined an offer of a thousand crowns a year as professor of the civil law in the university of Padua. Pope Urban VIII. who was himself a Latin poet, treated him with more than usual distinction, by conferring upon him the honour of knighthood, and accompanying this honour with an annual pension of one hundred pieces of money, but of what denomination, is not sufficiently apparent. Dempster likewise became a member of the Accademia della Notte, in which, according to the Italian fashion, he assumed the name of Evan-tius, and in the proceedings of which he is said to have taken a great interest. He now appeared to have reached a place of rest, when he was overtaken by the severest of all his calamities. After his arrival in Italy, his wife had born a daughter, who did not survive many days, and this was fortunately the only offspring of such a mother. On returning from one of his lectures, he discovered that she had made an elopement, in which one or more of his own pupils were either concerned as principals or accessories. He immediately commenced a pursuit of the fugitives, who seem to have added robbery to their other crime; but when he had proceeded as far as Vicenza, a city of Lombardy, he found that they must already have passed the Alps. This painful journey had been performed during the heat of the dog-days. Oppressed with fatigue of body and anguish of mind, he sought repose and tranquillity at Butri, in the neighbourhood of Bologna; but having been suddenly attacked with a fever, he was removed to his own residence, and there died on the 6th of September 1625, soon after he had completed the forty-sixth year of his age. His remains were interred in the church of St Dominic, where his brethren of the Accademia della Notte erected a monumental stone to his memory, and added a Latin inscription written in a very quaint style. One of their number, Ovidio Montalbani, pronounced his funeral oration, which was published in the course of the following year.¹

Such was the turbulent life, and such the premature death, of Thomas Dempster, a man distinguished by some eminent endowments of body as well as mind. In his person, he was above the ordinary size, and was possessed of proportional strength. He had an ample head, with black hair, and a dark complexion, so that in Italy he might easily have been mistaken for an Italian. He was a man of a noble aspect, and was possessed of undaunted courage. The irritability of his temperament involved him in many quarrels, nor was his sword less formidable than his pen. He never acquired the habit of restraining the natural impetuosity of his mind, and was equally decided and undisguised in his friendships and in his resentments. To his friends he was very pleasant, and equally odious to his enemies. Little inclined to forgive injuries, he pursued his enemies with the most violent animosity, and expressed his tumultuous feelings without any scrupulous regard to decency.² In several of his works, we find sufficient

evidence of his being somewhat loose in his assertions; Dempster, and indeed men of a violent and perverse disposition seem frequently to be incapable of distinguishing falsehood from truth: they are much inclined to embrace as true whatever is best suited to the state of their mind during its morbid excitement.

Dempster's intellectual endowments were likewise of a mixed character. He was endowed with such extraordinary powers of memory, and read with such indefatigable diligence, that he was regarded as a speaking library. It was customary with him to devote fourteen hours a day to study. He was allowed to possess an equal knowledge of the Greek and Latin languages; and his knowledge of both was so familiar, that in either language he undertook to dictate verses as rapidly as the pen of a ready writer could commit them to paper. He was a poet and philologist, as well as a civilian and historian. He evinces no mean portion of poetical fancy, and his verse is more elegant than his prose. His Musca is one of the few Latin poems, written by natives of Scotland, which the learned Wasse has recommended for republication.³ In his more elaborate works, he displays very extensive and diversified erudition, but in many instances his learning appears superior to his judgment. The life which he led was subject to many vicissitudes, and his writings partake of the same desultory character. His style is unequal, and frequently unpolished, nor is he sufficiently scrupulous in selecting words of the purer ages of Latinity.

His principal work, De Etruria Regali, was completed in the space of about three years; and when we consider its great extent, and its ample stores of recondite knowledge, we cannot but regard it as a wonderful performance. Errors and defects may naturally be expected to occur in a work relating to such a subject, and executed with so much rapidity; but sufficient room is still left for our admiration of the author's vivacity of mind, and resources of learning. His edition of Rosinus likewise displays the copiousness of his reading, and it has supplied materials to all those who have subsequently laboured in the department of Roman antiquities. His juridical works entitle him to a respectable place among civilians. Ludewig, who is himself an able writer, has expressed a wish that his notes on the Institutes of Justinian should be reprinted.⁴ As a classical critic, his character is chiefly to be ascertained from his editions of Claudian and Corippus, two poets who belong to the declining ages of Roman literature, and one of them indeed belongs to the latter part of the sixth century.⁵ The editor might easily have selected purer models of language and taste; but on various occasions he chose to travel in a by-path of his own, and his annotations on Corippus, as well as on Claudian, have contributed to his reputation as a man of miscellaneous erudition. Among his own works he enumerates notes on Statius and a commentary on Ælian, but there seems no reason to believe that they were ever printed.

On the ecclesiastical and literary history of Scotland, some of his publications are very slight and unsatisfactory. His Menologium and Scotia Illustrior are so much occu-

Dempster, pied with fierce contentions "de lana capris," that they can now excite little interest or curiosity. His Nomenclatura is a mere catalogue of names, which were to be illustrated in a subsequent work. In his native country, he is most generally known as the author of a book on which he has bestowed the title of Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Scotorum, a title which is by no means descriptive of its contents. It contains a long enumeration of Scottish saints, writers, and other worthies, who lived, or are supposed to have lived, at periods very remote from each other. Of many of his saints and writers, the very existence is considered as more than doubtful, and many of the rest belong, not to Scotland, but to other countries. It is not always easy to distinguish the early Scottish from the early Irish writers. The name of Scotia or Scotland has not been traced in any author who flourished before the third century.¹ At first it was exclusively applied to the country now called Ireland; but after the descendants of the Irish had established themselves in the north of Britain, they still retained the appellation of Scots; although it was not before the eleventh century that the name of Scotland was transferred from the one country to the other.² After that period, the green island gradually lost its ancient designation. Some degree of confusion may therefore be supposed to be connected with this identity of names, nor has it always been avoided by writers more accurate than Dempster. His notices of persons who lived in earlier times are necessarily very scanty, and are often very erroneous. Nor are his catalogues of books less remarkable than his list of writers: he ascribes various works to various individuals who flourished long before the art of writing was introduced into Scotland; and nothing can be more ludicrous than his formal enumeration of the productions of such imaginary authors. The principal value of his book consists in its notices of those writers who belonged to his own time, and particularly of those who passed the better part of their lives on the continent.³ Relative to these, he presents us with many curious gleanings of information, which is nowhere else to be found; and on many occasions his information is more authentic than his readers may be inclined to suppose. According to Bishop Lloyd, he "was as well inclined to believe a lie as any man in his time;"⁴ and to Dr Towers he "seems to have thought it highly meritorious to advance the grosse falsehoods, if those falsehoods would, in any degree, contribute to the honour of his country."⁵ A person convicted of many errors is naturally suspected of many more. Thus, when Dempster speaks of Kidd, or Cadanus, as being an eminent professor of law in the university of Toulouse, and the author of several works in prose and verse, he has perhaps by some readers been

suspected of introducing an imaginary character; and yet Dempster, the same individual, utterly forgotten in his native country, is mentioned by Baluze as a professor of great ability and reputation.⁶ On the continent there were many Latin poems and tracts published by natives of Scotland, during the age of Dempster and a short period immediately preceding; and such of them as were written by individuals who did not acquire any considerable celebrity, have in various instances left but few traces behind them.

The works of Dempster are very numerous and very miscellaneous. We subjoin a list, which is as complete as we have been able to render it; but he has himself enumerated various others, which do not appear to have been published. All the articles from No. 29 to No. 47 inclusive, are copied from his own list; and it is to be regretted that he has not described them in a more satisfactory manner.

Dempster 18. Scotorum Scriptorum Nomenclatura, &c. Bonon. 1619, 4to.
19. Scotia Illustrior; seu Mendicabula repressa, modesta Parochias; qua libelli famosi impudentia detegitur, mendacia ridicula confutatur, Scotiae Sancti sui vindicantur, ac bona fide asseruntur. Lugduni, 1620, 8vo.

Demurrage. 20. Asserti Scotiae Clives sui, S. Bonifacius Rationibus ix. Joannes Duns Rationibus xii. Bonon. 1621, 4to.
21. Ulyssis Aldrovandi Quadrupedum omnium Bisulcorum Historia: Joannes Cornelius Uterverius Belgae colligere incipit, Thomas Dempsterus, Baro a Murek Scotus, J. C. perfecte absolvit, Hieronymus Tamburinus in lucem edidit. Bonon. 1621, fol. Bonon. 1642, fol.
22. Menologium Scotorum. Bonon. 1622, 4to.
23. Apparatus ad Historiam Scotiam lib. ii. Accesserunt Martyrologium Scoticum Sanctorum DCLXXIX. Scriptorum Scotorum MDCLIII. Nomenclatura. e Bonon. 1622, 4to.—The first book treats "De Religione," and the second "De Regno." The work was intended as a prelude to his Historia Ecclesiastica.
24. Regressus sui 'OCLAS' in Glossas lib. iv. Institutionum Justiniani. Bonon. 1622, 8vo.
25. De Juramento lib. iii. Bonon. 1623, 8vo.
26. Benedicti Accolti de Bello a Christianis contra Barbaros gesto, pro Christi Sepulchro et Judaeis recuperandis, lib. iii. Thomas Dempsterus mendis expurgavit, et notis non vulgaribus illustravit. Florent. 1623, 4to. Nunc denso ad exemplar Florentinum CIOIOCCXIII. ab curavit Henricus Hofmider, cum indice satis luculento. Groninga, 1731, 8vo.
27. Lessus; sive Landatio Panefris illustris. D. Julio Cessari Signio, Episcopo Reatino. Bonon. 1623, 4to.
28. Votum Divae Virginis Sanctae. Bonon. 1623, 8vo.
29. Tragodia Stilico lib. i. Sammaxentii.
30. Epithalamium Marchionis Brandeburgici lib. i. Francofurti.
31. Epithalamium Vicecomitis Hadintonii lib. i. Londini.
32. Panegyricus Clementi VIII. Pontifici lib. i. Romae.
33. Panegyricus Paulo V. Pontifici lib. i. Romae.
34. Expostulatio cum Musis et Senatu Aremorio, dum custodiam suam innocentiae ultra subivit. Nemausi.
35. Divinatio ad Regem lib. i. Londini.
36. Eucharistion Alberto Archiduci lib. i. Duci et Lovanii.
37. Actio Scholastica de S. Catharina lib. i. Lutetiae.
38. Poemata de S. Thoma Aquinate lib. i. Tolose.
39. Aerosticha de Europae Principibus lib. i. Duci.
40. In Elizabetham Angliae Reginam lib. i. Duci.
41. Lachrymas ad Timoleontem d'Espinay Sanctucium in Funere Uxoris lib. i. Par. et Lugduni.
42. Judicium de omnibus omnium Gentium et Temporum Historiis lib. i. Par.
43. Note in Sphaeram lib. i. Francofurti.
44. Politicae Parecibases, nuncupatae Alexandro Razivillo, Principi Polono, auditori suo, lib. i. Par.
45. Genethliscon Delphini Franciae, nunc Regis Ludovici XIII. lib. i. Flexiae.
46. De Inundatione Anglicana lib. i. Flexiae.
47. Votum Scipioni Burghesio, S. R. E. Cardinali, lib. i. Romae.
48. Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Scotorum lib. xix. qua viri sanctitate, literis, dignitatibus, toto orbe illustres, et familiae Scotice, in varias urbes transmissae, et praecipue Placentium, recensentur. Illustrissimo viro Fabio Scoto Placo. Miceni Com. dicata. Bononae, 1627, 4to.—This posthumous work is printed in the most negligent manner, inasmuch that very many passages are scarcely intelligible. The reprint for the use of the Bannatyne Club: "Thomas Dempsteri Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Scotorum: sive, de Scriptoribus Scotia. Editio altera." Edinb. 1829, 2 tom. 4to, was superintended by Dr. Irving, who, in a preface of considerable length, has given an account of the author and his singular performance.
49. Cerasum et Sylvestre Prunum; opus poematium, de Virtutum et Vitorum Pagna; autore Alexandro Montgomerio Scoto, in Latinos versus translatum. Aretani Franc. 1631, 8vo. Edinb. 1698, 8vo.
50. De Etruria Regali libri vii. nunc primum editi, curante Thoma Coke, Magne Britanniae Armigero. Florentiae, 1723-4, 2 tom. fol.—A supplement to this work was published by Giambattista Passeri. Lucae, 1757, fol. (D. 1.)