Home1797 Edition

SEA

Volume 17 · 9,993 words · 1797 Edition

in a strict sense, signifies a large portion of water almost surrounded by land, as the Baltic and Mediterranean seas; but it is frequently used for that vast body of water which encompasses the whole earth.

What proportion the superficies of the sea bears to that of the land cannot easily be ascertained. Buffon has supposed that the surface of our globe is equally divided between land and water, and has accordingly calculated the superficies of the sea to be 85,490,506 square miles. But it is now well known that the ocean covers much more than the half of the earth's surface. Buffon believed the existence of a vast southern continent, which Captain Cook has shown to be visionary. It was this circumstance which misled him. According to the most accurate observations hitherto made, the surface of the sea is to the land as three to one; the ocean therefore extends over 128,235,759 square miles, supposing the superficies of the whole globe to be 170,981,012 square miles. To ascertain the depth of the sea is still more difficult than its superficies, both on account of the numerous experiments which it would be necessary to make, and the want of proper instruments for that purpose. Beyond a certain depth the sea has hitherto been found unfathomable; and though several methods have been contrived to obviate this difficulty, none of them has completely answered the purpose. We know in general that the depth of the sea increases gradually as we leave the shore; but if this continued beyond a certain distance, the depth in the middle of the ocean would be prodigious. Indeed the numerous islands everywhere scattered in the sea demonstrate the contrary, by showing us that the bottom of the water is unequal like the land, and that so far from uniformly sinking, it sometimes rises into lofty mountains. If the depth of the sea be in proportion to the elevation of the land, as has generally been supposed, its greatest depth will not exceed five or six miles, for there is no mountain six miles perpendicular above the level of the sea. The sea has never been actually founded to a greater depth than a mile and 66 feet; every thing beyond that therefore rests entirely upon conjecture and analogical reasoning, which ought never to be admitted to determine a single point that can be ascertained by experiment, because, when admitted, they have too often led to false conclusions. Along the coasts, where the depth of the sea is in general well known, it has always been found proportioned to the height of the shore: when the coast is high and mountainous, the sea that washes it is deep; when, on the contrary, the coast is low, the water is shallow. Whether this analogy holds at a distance from the shore, experiments alone can determine.

To calculate the quantity of water contained in the Quantity sea, while its depth is unknown, is impossible. But if we suppose with Buffon that its medium depth is the fourth part of a mile, the ocean, if its superficies be 128,235,759 square miles, will contain 32,058,939-75 cubic miles of water.

Let us now endeavour to compute the quantity of water which is constantly discharged into the sea. For this purpose let us take a river whose velocity and quantity of water is known, the Po, for instance, which according to Riccioli is 1000 feet (or 100 perches of Boulogne) broad, 10 feet deep, and runs at the rate of art. 10 four miles in an hour; consequently that river discharges into the sea 200,000 cubic perches of water in an hour, or 4,800,000 in a day. A cubic mile contains 125,000,000 cubic perches; the Po therefore will take 26 days to discharge a cubic mile of water into the sea. Let us now suppose, what is perhaps not very far from the truth, that the quantity of water which the sea receives from the rivers in any country is proportioned to the extent of that country. The Po from its origin to its mouth traverses a country 380 miles long, and the rivers which fall into it on every side rise from sources about sixty miles distant from it. The Po, therefore, and the rivers which it receives, water a country of 45,600 square miles. Now since the whole superficies of the dry land is about 427,455,253 square miles, it follows, from our supposition, that the quantity of water discharged by all the rivers in the world, in one day, is 36 cubic miles, and in a year 13,140. If therefore the sea contains 32,058,939 cubic miles of water, it would take all the rivers in the world 24,39 years to discharge an equal quantity.

It may seem surprising that the sea, since it is continually receiving such an immense supply of water, does not visibly increase, and at last cover the whole earth, increases. But our surprise will cease, if we consider that the rivers themselves are supplied from the sea, and that they do nothing more than carry back those waters which the ocean is continually lavishing upon the earth. Dr. Halley has demonstrated that the vapours raised from the sea and transported upon land are sufficient to maintain all the rivers in the world. The simplicity of this great process is astonishing; the sea not only connects distant distant countries, and renders it easy to transport the commodities of one nation to another, but its waters rising in the air descend in flowers to fertilise the earth and nourish the vegetable kingdom, and collecting into rivers flow onwards, bringing fertility and wealth and commerce along with them, and again return to the sea to repeat the same round.

The knowledge of this process of nature might, one would think, have convinced philosophers that the proportion between sea and land continued always nearly the same. Philosophers however have formed different theories about this as well as most other subjects, maintaining on the one hand that the sea is continually encroaching on the land, and on the other that the land is constantly gaining on the sea. Both sides have supported their theories by arguments, demonstrations, and uncontrovertible facts!

The height of the mountains, say the philosophers who support the encroachments of the sea, is continually diminishing; exposed to the violence of every storm, the hardest rocks must at last give way and tumble down. The rivers are continually sweeping along with them particles of earth which they deposit in the bottom of the sea. Both the depth of the ocean then and the height of the dry land must be always decreasing; the waters therefore must, unless a part of them were annihilated, spread over a greater extent of surface in proportion as these causes operate. This reasoning, convincing as it is, might be confirmed by a great number of facts: it will be sufficient however to mention one or two. In the reign of Augustus the Isle of Wight made a part of Britain, so that the English crossed over to it at low water with cart loads of tin; yet that island is at present separated from Britain by a channel half a mile wide. The Godwin sands on the eastern shore of England were formerly the fertile estate of earl Godwin. Nor are the encroachments of the sea confined to Britain. In the bay of Baiae near Naples there are remains of housetops and streets still visible below the present level of the sea. The sea therefore is making continued encroachments upon the land; and the time will come, say they, when the waters will again cover the surface of the earth.

Such are the arguments of those philosophers who maintain the continual encroachments of the sea. Those who maintain the opposite theory, that the land is gradually gaining on the sea, though they pretend not to deny the facts advanced by their opponents, affirm that they are altogether insufficient to establish the hypothesis which they were brought forward to support. Though the rivers carry down particles of earth into the sea, these, say they, are either accumulated on other shores, or, collecting in the bottom of the ocean, harden into stone, which being possessed of a vegetative power rises by degrees above the surface of the sea and form rocks, and mountains, and islands. The vegetative nature of stone indeed is sufficient, of itself, to convince us that the quantity of earth must be daily accumulating, and consequently that the surface of the sea is diminishing in extent. Celsius, a Swedish philosopher (for this dispute has been carried on in Sweden with the greatest keenness), has endeavoured to build this theory with more solid materials than vegetable stone.

In a curious memoir, published in 1743, he affirms that the Baltic and the Atlantic, at least that part of it which washes Norway, is constantly diminishing; and he proves this by the testimony of a great many aged pilots and fishermen, who affirmed that the sea was become much shallower in many places than it had been during their youth: that many rocks formerly covered with water were now several feet above the surface of the sea: that loaded vessels used formerly to ride in many places where pinnaces and barks could now with difficulty swim. He produces instances of ancient sea-port towns now several leagues from the shore, and of anchors and wrecks of vessels found far within the country. He mentions a particular rock which 168 years before was at the bottom of the sea, but was then raised eight feet above its surface. In another place where the water 50 years before had reached to the knee there was then none. Several rocks, too, which during the infancy of some old pilots had been two feet under water, were then three feet above it. From all these observations M. Celsius concludes, that the water of the Baltic decreases in height $4\frac{1}{2}$ lines in a year, 4 inches 5 lines in 18 years, 4 feet 5 inches in a hundred years, and in a thousand years 45 feet. Confessing, however, that these facts, how conclusive forever as far as relates to the Baltic, can never determine the general question, M. Celsius advances another argument in support of his theory. All that quantity of moisture, says he, which is imbibed by plants is lost to the general mass of water, being converted into earth by the putrefaction of vegetables. This notion had been mentioned by Newton, and was adopted by Van Helmont: if granted, it follows as a consequence that the earth is continually increasing and the water diminishing in a very rapid degree.

Such are the arguments advanced in support of both these theories; for it is needless to mention a notion of Linnaeus that the whole earth was formerly covered with water except a single mountain. When fairly weighed, they amount to nothing more than this, that the sea has encroached upon the land in some places, and retired in others; a conclusion which we are very willing to allow. What was advanced by those philosophers, who maintain that the sea is continually encroaching on the land, about the depth of the sea constantly diminishing, must remain a mere assertion till they prove by experiments, either that this is really the case, or that nature has no way of restoring those particles of earth which are washed down by the rivers. Nor have they any good reason to affirm that the height of the mountains is decreasing. Can a single uncontrovertible instance be produced of this? Are the Alps or the Apennines, or Taurus, or Caucasus, less lofty now than they were a thousand years ago? We mean not to deny that the rain actually washes down particles of earth from the mountains, nor to affirm that the hardest rocks are able to resist continual storms, nor that many mountains have suffered, and continue to suffer daily, from a thousand accidents. But the effects produced by all these causes are so trifling as to be altogether imperceptible (a). Nature has vigilantly guarded against such accidents; she has formed the mountains of the most durable

(a) M. Genfanne pretends that the Pyrenean mountains become an inch lower every ten years. But even according SEA

The materials; and where they are covered with earth, she has bound it together by a thick and firm matting of grasses, and thus secured it from the rains; and should accident deprive it of this covering, she takes care immediately to supply the defect. Even should the earth be swept away together with its covering, nature has still such resources left as frequently restore things to their former state. Many kinds of moss, one would be tempted to think, have been created for this very purpose: they take root and flourish almost upon the bare rock, and furnish as they decay a sufficient bed for several of the hardy Alpine plants. These perish in their turn, and others succeed them. The roots of the plants bind fast the earth as it accumulates, more plants spring up and spread wider, till by degrees the whole surface is covered with a firm coat of grass. Even the rain, which always contains in it a good deal of earth, contributes something to hasten the process.

As the vegetation of stone, an argument advanced by the philosophers who support the opposite theory, is now, we believe, given up by all parties, it is needless to take any farther notice of it here, (see Stone). The hypothesis of M. Cellius, that water is converted into earth, has also shared the same fate, because it was unsupported by experiment, and contrary to every thing that we know either about earth or water. It is a little extraordinary that philosophers have been so lavish of water as to convert it in this manner into stone and earth, when they had given it, one would think, sufficient employment before in making new worlds and in confuting Moses.

As the sea covers so great a portion of the globe, we should, no doubt, by exploring its bottom, discover a vast number of interesting particulars. Unfortunately in the greater part of the ocean this has hitherto been impossible. Part, however, has been examined; and the discoveries which this examination has produced may enable us to form some idea at least of the whole. The bottom of the sea, as might have been conjectured indeed beforehand, bears a great resemblance to the surface of the dry land, being, like it, full of plains, rocks, caverns, and mountains; some of which are abrupt and almost perpendicular, while others rise with a gentle declivity, and sometimes tower above the water and form islands. Neither do the materials differ which compose the bottom of the sea and the basis of the dry land. If we dig to a considerable depth in any part of the earth, we uniformly meet with rock; the same thing holds in the sea. The strata, too, are of the same kind, disposed in the same manner, and form indeed but one whole. The same kind of mineral and bituminous substances are also found interspersed with these strata; and it is to them probably that the sea is indebted for its bitter taste. Over these natural and original strata an artificial bed has pretty generally been formed, composed of different materials in different places. It consists frequently of muddy tartarous substances firmly cemented together, sometimes of shells or coral reduced to powder, and near the mouths of rivers it is generally composed of fine sand or gravel. The bottom of the sea resembles the land likewise in another particular: many fresh springs and even rivers rise out of it, which, replacing the salt water, render the lower part of the sea wherever they abound quite fresh. An instance of this kind occurs near Goa on the western coast of India.

Substances of a very beautiful appearance are frequently brought up by the sounding line from the bottom of the sea. The plummet is hollowed below, and this cavity filled with tallow, to which some of the substances adhere which form the bed of the ocean. These are generally sand, gravel, or mud; but they are sometimes of the brightest scarlet, vermilion, purple, and yellow; and sometimes, though less frequently, they are blue, green, or white. These colours are owing to a kind of jelly which envelopes the substances, and vanishes entirely as soon as this jelly dries. At times, however, they assume the appearance of tartarous crusts, and are then so permanent, that they can be received into white wax melted and poured round them, and perhaps by proper care might be converted into valuable paints.

Sea-water is really, as any one may convince himself by pouring it into a glass, as clear and transparent as river water. The various appearances therefore which it assumes are owing to accidental causes, and not to any change in the water itself. The depth, or the materials which compose the bottom of the sea, occasions it to assume different colours in different places. The Arabian gulf, for instance, is said to be red from the colour of the sands which form its bed. The appearance of the sea is affected too by the winds and the sun, while the clouds that pass over it communicate all their various and fleeting colours. When the sun shines it is green; when the sun gleams through a fog it is yellow; near the north pole it appears black; while in the torrid zone its colour is often brown. Sometimes the sea assumes a luminous appearance. See Light, n° 47.

The sea contains the greatest quantity of salt in the saltness of the torrid zone, where otherwise from the excessive heat the sea, it would be in danger of putrefaction: as we advance northward this quantity diminishes, till at the pole it nearly vanishes altogether. Under the line Lucas found that the sea contained a seventh part of solid contents, consisting chiefly of sea-salt. At Harwich he found it yielded a third part (ii), and on the coast of Greenland a great deal less. This deficiency of salt near the poles probably contributes a good deal towards the prodigious quantities of ice which are met with in these seas; for according to his own calculation, it would require a million of years to level these mountains with the plain, though they continued to decrease at the same rate; and philosophers tell us that this rate is constantly diminishing!

(n) This gradual diminution of saltness from the equator to the pole is not, however, without particular exceptions. The Mediterranean sea contains a seventh of sea-salt, which is less than the German sea contains. Sea water requires a much greater degree of cold to freeze it than fresh water. It was this circumstance, probably, together with its constant motion, which induced the ancients to believe that the sea never froze. Even among the moderns it has been a generally received opinion, that sea-ice is originally formed in rivers. Buffon has made the great quantities of ice with which the South Sea abounds an argument for the existence of a continent near the Antarctic pole. But it is now well known that great quantities of ice are formed at a distance from land. Sea-ice is of two kinds; field ice, which extends along the shore, and is only two or three feet thick; and mountain ice, which abounds in the middle of the ocean. The size of these mountains is sometimes prodigious. The sea-ice is always fresh, and has been often of great use to navigators.

The weight of sea-water is that of river-water as 73 to 70; that is, a cubic foot of sea-water weighs 73 lb., while the same quantity of river-water weighs only 70 lb.; but this proportion varies in different places. It is worthy of our attention, too, that the water at the surface of the sea contains less salt than near the bottom; the difference indeed is inconsiderable, but still it is something. The Compte de Marigl found the same quantity of water, when taken from the bottom of the Mediterranean, to weigh one ounce three pennyweights 51 grains; whereas from the surface it weighed only one ounce three pennyweights 49 grains. He repeated the experiment frequently with nearly the same result.

The sea, with respect to temperature, may be divided into two regions: the first begins at the surface of the water, and extends as far as the influence of the sun's rays; the second reaches from thence to the bottom of the sea. In summer the lower region is considerably colder than the upper; but it is probable that during winter the reverse takes place; at least the Compte de Marigl found it so repeatedly in the Mediterranean. This naturally results from the situation of the water near the bottom of the sea. Uninfluenced by the changes in the atmosphere, it retains always nearly the same degree of temperature; and this is considerably above congelation; for the lower region of the sea, at least in the temperate parts of the world, was never known to freeze.

Captain Ellis let down a sea-gage (see Gage) in latitude 25° 13' north, and longitude 25° 12' west, to take the degrees of temperature and saltness of the sea at different depths. It descended 5346 feet, which is a mile and eleven fathoms. He found the sea saltier and colder in proportion to its depth till the gage had descended 3900 feet, when the mercury in the thermometer came up at 53; but the water never grew colder, though he let down the gage 2446 feet lower. At the surface the thermometer stood at 84.

The sea has three kinds of motion: 1. The first is that undulation which is occasioned by the wind. This motion is entirely confined to the surface; the bottom even during the most violent storms remains perfectly calm. Mr Boyle has remarked, from the testimony of several divers, that the sea is affected by the winds only to the depth of six feet. It would follow from this, that the height of the waves above the surface does not exceed six feet; and that this holds in the Mediterranean at least, we are informed by the Compte de Marigl, though he also sometimes observed them, during a very violent tempest, rise two feet higher. It is affirmed by Pliny, and several other ancient writers, that oil calms the waves of the sea; and that divers were accustomed to carry some of it for that purpose in their mouths. This account was always considered by the oil-moderns as a fable, and treated with such contempt, that they did not even deign to put it to the test of experiment, till Dr Franklin accidentally discovered its truth. Happening in 1757 to be in the middle of a large fleet, he observed that the water round one or two vessels was quite calm and smooth, while everywhere else it was very much agitated by the winds. He applied to the captain for an explanation of this phenomenon, who replied, that the cooks, he supposed, had thrown their greasy water out at the scupper-holes, and by that means oiled the sides of the vessels in question. This answer did not satisfy the Doctor at first; but recollecting what Pliny had said on the subject, he resolved at least to try the experiment. He did so accordingly in 1762, and found that oil actually calmed the waves of the sea. He repeated the experiment upon lake Clapham: the oil spread itself with great rapidity upon the surface, but did not produce the desired effect, because, having been thrown in upon the side opposite to the wind, it was immediately driven to the edge of the water. But upon throwing in a like quantity upon the other side of the lake, it calmed in an instant several yards of the surface; and gradually spreading, rendered all that part of the lake, to the extent of at least half an acre, as smooth as glass. The curious effect produced by this liquid may be accounted for by the repulsion which exists between oil and water, and between oil and air, which prevents all immediate contact, all rubbing of the one upon the other.

2. The second kind of motion is that continual tendency which the whole water in the sea has towards the west. It is greater near the equator than about the west—Cape poles; and indeed cannot be said to take place at all in the northern hemisphere beyond the tropic. It begins on the west side of America, where it is moderate; hence that part of the ocean has been called Pacific. As the waters advance westward their motion is accelerated; so that, after having traversed the globe, they strike with great violence on the eastern shore of America. Being stopped by that continent, they turn northward, and run with considerable impetuosity into the gulph of Mexico; from thence they proceed along the coast of North America, till they come to the south side of the great bank at Newfoundland, when they turn off, and run down through the Western Isles. This current is called the Gulph Stream. It was first accurately described by Dr Franklin, who remarked also, that the water in it having been originally heated in the torrid zone, cools so gradually in its passage northward, that even the latitude might be found in any part of the stream by means of a thermometer.—This motion of the sea westward has never been explained; it seems to have some connection with the trade-winds and the diurnal revolution of the earth on its axis.

3. The third and most remarkable motion of the sea is the tide, which is a regular swell of the ocean once called every 12 hours, owing, as Newton has demonstrated, to the attraction of the moon. In the middle of the sea the tide seldom rises higher than one or two feet, but on the coast it frequently reaches the height of 45 feet. feet, and in some places even more. The tide generally rises higher in the evening than in the morning; on the coast of Britain this holds in winter, but in summer the morning tides are highest. In some seas it is said that there are no tides. This cannot be owing to their being surrounded by land, because there is a tide in the lakes of North America. For an explanation of these and other phenomena we refer to the article Tide.

Sea-Air, that part of the atmosphere which is above the sea.

Sea-air has been found salubrious and remarkably beneficial in some distempers. This may be owing to its containing a greater portion of oxygenous gas or vital air, and being less impregnated with noxious vapours than the land. Dr Ingenhouz made several experiments to ascertain the salubrity of sea-air. By mixing equal measures of common air and nitrous air, he found, that at Gravelines, they occupied about 104, or one measure, and \( \frac{1}{2} \) of a measure; whereas on sea, about three miles from the mouth of the Thames, two measures of air (one of common and one of nitrous air) occupied from 0.91 to 0.94. He attempted a similar experiment on the middle of the channel between the English coast and Ostend; but the motion of the ship rendered it impracticable. He found that in rainy and windy weather the sea-air contained a smaller quantity of vital air than when the weather was calm. On the sea-shore at Ostend it occupied from 94\( \frac{1}{2} \) to 97; at Bruges he found it at 105; and at Antwerp 109\( \frac{1}{2} \).

Dr Ingenhouz thus concludes his paper:

It appears, from these experiments, that the air at sea and close to it is in general purer and fitter for animal life than the air on the land, though it seems to be subject to the same inconstancy in its degree of purity with that of the land; so that we may now with more confidence send our patients, labouring under consumptive disorders, to the sea, or at least to places situated close to the sea, which have no marshes in their neighbourhood. It seems also probable, that the air will be found in general much purer far from the land than near the shore, the former being never subject to be mixed with land air.

Dr Damman, an eminent physician and professor royal of midwifery at Ghent, told Dr Ingenhouz, that when he was formerly a practitioner at Ostend, during seven years, he found the people there remarkably healthy; that nothing was rarer there than to see a patient labouring under a consumption or asthma, a malignant, putrid, or spotted fever; that the disease to which they are the most subject, is a regular intermittent fever in autumn, when sudden transitions from hot to cold weather happen.

People are in general very healthy at Gibraltar, though there are very few trees near that place; which Dr Ingenhouz thinks is owing to the purity of the air, arising from the neighbourhood of the sea.

Most small islands are very healthy.

At Malta people are little subject to diseases, and live to a very advanced age.

Sea-Anemone. See Animal-Flower.

Sea-Bear. See Phoca.

Sea-Calf. See Phoca.

Sea-Cow. See Trichecus.

Sea-Crow, Mire-Crow, or Pewit. See Larus.

Sea-Dead. See Asphaltites.

Sea-Devil. See Lophius.

Sea-Dragon, a monster of a very singular nature. In the Gentleman's Magazine for the year 1749, we have the account of a sea-dragon which was said to be taken between Orford and Southwold, on the coast of Suffolk, and afterwards carried round the country as a curiosity by the fisherman who caught it.

"Its head and tail (says the writer) resemble those of an alligator; it has two large fins, which serve it both to swim and to fly; and though they were so dried that I could not extend them, yet they appear, by the folds, to be shaped like those which painters have given to dragons and other winged monsters that serve as supporters to coats of arms. Its body is covered with impenetrable scales; its legs have two joints, and its feet are hooped like those of an ass; it has five rows of very white and sharp teeth in each jaw, and is in length about four feet, though it was longer when alive, it having shrunk as it became dry.

"It was caught in a net with mackerel; and being dragged on shore, was knocked down with a stretcher or boat-hook. The net being opened, it suddenly sprung up, and flew above 50 yards; the man who first seized it had several of his fingers bitten off; and the wound mortifying, he died. It afterwards fastened on the man's arm who shows it, and lacerated it so much, that the muscles are shrunk, and the hand and fingers distorted; the wound is not yet healed, and is thought to be incurable. It is said by some to have been described by naturalists under the name of the Sea-dragon." See Plate CCCCXLIX.

Sea-Gage. See Sea-Gar.

Sea-Hare. See Laplysia.

Sea-Horse, in ichthyology, the English name of the Hippocampus. See Syngnathus.

Sea-Lemon. See Doris.

Sea-Lion. See Phoca.

Sea-Mall, or Sea-Mew. See Larus.

Sea-Man. See Mermaid.

Sea-Marks. The erection of beacons, light-houses, and sea-marks, is a branch of the royal prerogative. By 8 Eliz. 13, the corporation of the Trinity-houle are empowered to set up any beacons or sea-marks wherever they shall think them necessary; and if the owner of the land or any other person shall destroy them, or take down any steeple, tree, or other known sea-mark, he shall forfeit 100l. Sterling; or, in case of inability to pay it, he shall be ipso facto outlawed.

Sea-Needle, Garfish. See Esox.

Sea-Nettle. See Animal-Flower.

Sea-Pie, or Oyster-Catcher. See Hæmatopus.

Sea Plants, are those vegetables that grow in salt-water within the shores of the sea. The old botanists divided these into three classes. 1. The first class, according to their arrangement, contained the Alga, the fuici, the sea-mosses or confervas, and the different species of sponges. 2. The second contained substances of a hard texture, like stone or horn, which seem to have been of the same nature with what we call zoophyta, with this difference, that we refer sponges to this class and not to the first. The third class was the same with our lithophyta, comprehending corals, mandrepora, &c. It is now well known that the genera belonging to the second and third of these classes, and even some referred to the first, are not vegetables, but animals, or the productions of animals. See CORALLINA, MADREpora, SPONGIA. Sea-plants, then, properly speaking, belong to the class of cryptogamia, and the order of algae; and, according to Bonare, are all comprehended under the genus of fucus. We may also add several species of the ulva and conferva and the fargazo. The fuci and marine ulvae are immersed in the sea, are sessile, and without root. The marine confervae are either sessile or floating. The fargazo grows beyond foundings.

As some species of the fucus, when dried and preserved, are extremely beautiful, the curious, and especially those who prosecute the study of botany, must be anxious to know the best method of preserving them, without destroying their colour and beauty. The following method is recommended by M. Mauduyt. Take a sheet of paper, or rather of palatine board, and cover it with varnish on both sides; and having rowed in a boat to the rock where the fucus abounds, plunge your varnished paper into the water, and, detaching the fucus, receive it upon the paper. Agitate the paper gently in the water, that the plant may be properly spread over it; and lift them up together softly out of the water; then fix down with pins the strong stalks, that they may not be displaced, and leave the plant lying upon the varnished paper to dry in the open air. When it is fully dry, the different parts will retain their position, and the plant may be preserved within the leaves of a book. If you wish to free it from the slime and salt which adheres to it, it may be washed gently in fresh water, after being removed from the rock on which it grew.

Sea-Serpent, a monstrous creature, said to inhabit the northern seas about Greenland and the coasts of Norway. The following marvellous account of this monster is given by Guthrie. "In 1756, one of them was shot by a matter of a ship: its head resembled that of a horse; the mouth was large and black, as were the eyes, a white mane hanging from its neck: it floated on the surface of the water, and held its head at least two feet out of the sea: between the head and neck were seven or eight folds, which were very thick; and the length of this snake was more than 100 yards, some say fathoms. They have a remarkable aversion to the smell of caustic; for which reason, ship, boat, and bark masters provide themselves with quantities of that drug, to prevent being overfed, the serpent's olfactory nerves being remarkably exquisite. The particularities related of this animal would be incredible, were they not attested upon oath. Egede, a very reputable author, says, that on the 6th day of July 1734, a large and frightful sea-monster raised itself so high out of the water, that its head reached above the main-top-mast of the ship; that it had a long sharp snout, broad paws, and spouted water like a whale; that the body seemed to be covered with scales; the skin was uneven and wrinkled, and the lower part was formed like a snake. The body of this monster is said to be as thick as a hog's head; his skin is variegated like a tortoise shell; and his excrement, which floats upon the surface of the water, is corrosive." Notwithstanding the belief of Guthrie, and the testimony which he produces, we cannot help doubting of the existence of the sea-serpent. Its bulk is said to be so disproportionate to all the known animals of our globe, that it requires more than ordinary evidence to render it credible; but the evidence which is offered is so very feeble and unsatisfactory, that no man of sound judgment would think it sufficient to establish the truth of an extraordinary fact.

Sea-Sickness, a disorder incident to most persons on their first going to sea, occasioned by the agitation of the vessel. In voyages, sea-sickness, though it continues in general only for the first day or two, is extremely harassing to some people at intervals, especially on any increased motion of the vessel. Sometimes, by long continuance, it causes fever, headache, quick pulse, thirst, white tongue, and a total deprivation of the retention of the stomach; evils which are always difficult to remove, and frequently terminate only with the voyage.

This indisposition is considerably alleviated by a small tea spoonful of ether, taken now and then in a glass of water, and applying some of it to the temples and nostrils. The ancient writers recommend acid fruits, bread and vegetables soaked in vinegar, after the stomach has been cleansed by vomiting; but not to attempt to suppress the vomiting until that end was obtained. An old remedy for sea-sickness, and a very common one among sailors, is a draught or two of sea water; which, though a disagreeing medicine at such a time, yet where the affections are foul and loaded, generally produces the desired effect when the perturbation it occasions ceases.

Sea-Star. See ASTERIAS.

Sea-Urchine. See ECHINUS.

Sea-Water, the salt water of the sea. The principal salts contained in sea-water are, 1st, Common marine or culinary salt, compounded of fossil alkali or soda and marine acid; 2dly, A salt formed by the union of the same acid with magnesian earth; and, lastly, A small quantity of selenite. The quantity of saline matter contained in a pint of sea-water, in the British seas, is, according to Neumann, about one ounce in each pint (a).

The saltness of this water is judged to arise from great multitudes both of mines and mountains of salt dispersed here and there in the depths of the sea. Dr Halley supposes that it is probable the greatest part of the sea-salt, and of all salt lakes, as the Caspian Sea, the Dead Sea, the Lake of Mexico, and the Titicaca in

(a) In Sir Torbern Bergman's analysis of sea-water taken up in the beginning of June 1776, about the latitude of the Canaries, from the depth of 60 fathoms, the solid contents of a pint of the water were,

| Of common salt | Grs. | |----------------|------| | Salited magnesia | 253 6 1/2 | | Gypsum | 69 1/2 | | Total | 330 2 |

or 5 1 10 1/2 in Peru, is derived from the water of the rivers which they receive; and since this sort of lakes has no exit or discharge but by the exhalation of vapors, and also since these vapors are entirely fresh or devoid of such particles, it is certain that the saltness of the sea and of such lakes must from time to time increase; and therefore the saltness at this time must be greater than at any time heretofore. He further adds, that if, by experiments made in different ages, we could find the different quantity of salt which the same quantity of water (taken up in the same place, and in all other the same circumstances) would afford, it would be easy from thence, by rules of proportion, to find the age of the world very nearly, or the time wherein it has been acquiring its present saltness.

This opinion of Dr Halley is so improbable, that it is surprising for acute a philosopher could have adopted it. That fresh water rivers should in the course of many thousand years produce saltness in the sea, is quite incredible. If this were the case, every sea or great body of water which receives rivers must be salt, and must possess a degree of saltness in proportion to the quantity of water which the rivers discharge. But so far is this from being true, that the Palus Meotis and the great lakes in America do not contain salt but fresh water. It may indeed be objected, that the quantity of salt which the rivers carry along with them and deposit in the sea, must depend on the nature of the soil through which they flow, which may in some places contain no salt at all; and this may be the reason why the great lakes in America and the Palus Meotis are fresh. But to this opinion, which is merely hypothetical, there are insurmountable objections. It is a curious fact that the saltness of the sea is greatest under the line, and diminishes gradually as we advance to the poles: We must therefore suppose, if Dr Halley's theory be true, that the earth contains more salt in the tropical regions than in the temperate zones, and more in the temperate zones than in the frigid; and consequently that the rivers in these different regions contain a quantity of salt proportionable to their distance from the equator. This, however, must first be proved by experiment, and cannot be assumed as an established fact. But there is another circumstance that entirely destroys this theory. If we allow that the sea receives its saltness from the rivers, it must be equally salt or nearly so in every part of the earth. For, according to a simple and well known principle in chemistry, when any substance is dissolved in water with the assistance of agitation, at whatever part of the water it is introduced, it will be equally diffused through the whole liquid. Now though it were true that a greater quantity of salt were introduced into the sea under the line than towards the poles, from the constant agitation occasioned by the wind and tide, the salt must soon pervade the whole mass of water. To say that the superior degree of heat in the tropical regions may dissolve a greater quantity of salt, will not destroy our argument; for it is an established principle in chemistry, that cold water will dissolve nearly as great a quantity of salt as hot water can dissolve.

The saltness of the sea has also been ascribed to the solution of subterraneous mines of salt which is supposed to abound in the bottom of the sea and along its shores. But this hypothesis cannot be supported. If the sea were constantly dissolving salt, it would soon become saturated; for it cannot be said that it is deprived of any part of its salt by evaporation, since rainwater is fresh. If the sea were to become saturated, neither fishes nor vegetables could live in it. We must therefore despair of being able to account for the saltness of the sea by second causes; and must suppose that it has been salt from the creation. It is impossible indeed to suppose that the waters of the sea were at any period fresh since the formation of fishes and sea-plants; for as these will not live in water saturated with salt, neither will they live in water that is fresh; we therefore conclude that the saltness of the sea has been nearly the same in all ages. This is the simplest hypothesis of the three that has been mentioned. It explains best the various phenomena, and is involved in fewest difficulties. We shall, however, allow that there may be some exceptions; that the saltness of some seas, or of particular parts of the same sea, may be increased by mines of rock-salt dispersed near its shores.

With regard to the use of this salt property of seawater, it is observed, that the saltness of the sea preserves its waters pure and sweet, which otherwise would corrupt and stink like a filthy lake, and consequently that none of the myriads of creatures which now live therein could then have a being. From thence also the sea-water becomes much heavier, and therefore ships of greater size and quantity may be used thereon. Salt-water also doth not freeze so soon as fresh-water, whence the seas are more free for navigation. We have a dissertation, by Dr Ruffel, concerning the medical uses of sea-water in diseases of the glands, &c. wherein the author premises some observations upon the nature of seawater, considered as impregnated with particles of all the bodies it passes over, such as submarine plants, fish, salts, minerals, &c. and saturated with their several effluvia, to enrich it and keep it from putrefaction; whence this fluid is supposed to contract a soapiness; and the whole collection, being pervaded by the sulphurous streams passing through it, to constitute what we call sea-water; the confessed distinguishing characteristics of which are saltness, bitterness, nitrocity, and unctuousness; whence the author concludes, that it may be justly expected to contribute signalily to the improvement of physic. The cases in which our author informs us we are to expect advantage from sea-water are, 1. In all recent obstructions of the glands of the intestines and mesenteries. 2. All recent obstructions of the pulmonary glands, and those of the visceræ, which frequently produce consumptions. 3. All recent glandular swellings of the neck, or other parts. 4. Recent tumors of the joints, if they are not suppurated, or become scirrhus or cancerous, and have not carious bones for their cause. 5. Recent defluxions upon the glands of the eyelids. 6. All defecations of the skin, from an erysipelas to a lepra. 7. Diseases of the glands of the nose, with their usual companion a thickness of the lip. 8. Obstructions of the kidneys, where there is no inflammation, and the stone not large. 9. In recent obstructions of the liver, this method will be proper, where it prevents constipations of the belly, and affords other medicines directed in icterical cases. The same remedy is said to be of signal service in the bronchocele; and is likewise recommended for the prevention of those bilious colics that so frequently affect our mariners.

Preservation of Sea-Water from Putrefaction. As it is sometimes necessary to preserve sea-water in casks for bathing and other purposes, it is of importance to know how to keep it from putrefaction. Many experiments were made to determine this point by Mr Henry, and are recorded in the first volume of the Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester. His first experiment we shall here present to our readers. "To one quart of sea-water were added two scruples of fresh quicklime; to another, half an ounce of common culinary salt; and a third was kept as a standard without any addition. The mouths of the bottles being loosely covered with paper, they were exposed to the action of the sun in some of the hottest weather in summer. In about a week the standard became very offensive; and the water, with the additional quantity of salt, did not continue sweet many hours longer; whereas that with lime continued many months without ever exhibiting the least marks of putrefaction."

When he added a dram more of quicklime, the whole of the magnesia contained in the water was separated; and when a further addition was made, a lime-water was immediately formed. He therefore concluded, that two scruples of quicklime are sufficient to preserve a quart of sea-water. The proportions, however, may vary a little, according to the strength of the quicklime employed.

Freshening of Sea-Water. The method of making sea-water fresh was long a desideratum in navigation. Many methods have been proposed for this purpose. Mr Appleby published an account of a process which he had instituted in the year 1734. He distilled sea-water with a quantity of lapis internalis and calcined bones; but this process was soon laid aside, as it was not only difficult in itself, but rendered the water unpalatable. Dr Butler proposed soap-lys in place of Mr Appleby's ingredients; but the water was still liable to the same objection. Dr Stephen Hales recommended powdered chalk; but his method was expensive, and did not improve the taste of the water. Dr Lind of Portsmouth distilled sea-water without any ingredients; but as the experiment he made was performed in a vessel containing only two quarts, with a glass receiver in his study, nothing conclusive can be drawn from it for the use of sailors. At length Dr Irving's process brought the process to a very high degree of simplicity and perfection, by which the water is obtained pure, without much expense of fuel or a complicated apparatus. For this valuable discovery he received a reward of L500. The advantages of his method remain to be stated, which may be reduced to the following: 1. The abolishing all flues, still-heads, worm-pipes, and their tubes, which occupy too much space as to render them totally incompatible with the necessary buttends of the ship; and using in the room of these the ship's kettle or boiler, to the top whereof may occasionally be applied a simple tube, which can be easily made on board a vessel at sea, of iron plate, stove funnel, or tin sheet; so that no situation can prevent a ship from being completely supplied with the means of distilling sea-water. 2. In consequence of the principles of distillation being fully ascertained, the contrivance of the simplest means of obtaining the greatest quantity of distilled water, by making the tube sufficiently large to receive the whole column of vapour, and placing it nearly in a horizontal direction, to prevent any compression of the fluid, which takes place too much with the common worm. 3. The adopting of the simplest and most efficacious means of condensing vapour; for nothing more is required in the distillation but keeping the surface of the tube always wet, which is done by having some sea-water at hand, and a person to dip a mop or swab into this water, and pass it along the upper surface of the tube. By this operation the vapour contained in the tube will be entirely condensed with the greatest rapidity imaginable; for by the application of the wet mop thin sheets of water are uniformly spread, and mechanically pressed upon the surface of the hot tube; which being converted into vapour make way for a succession of fresh sheets; and thus, both by the evaporation and close contact of the cold water constantly repeated, the heat is carried off more effectually than by any other method yet known. 4. The carrying on the distillation without any addition, a correct chemical analysis of sea-water having evinced the futility of mixing ingredients with it, either to prevent an acid from rising with the vapour, or to destroy any bituminous oil supposed to exist in sea-water, and to contaminate the distilled water, giving it that fiery unpalatable taste inseparable from the former processes. 5. The ascertaining the proper quantity of sea water that ought to be distilled, whereby the fresh water is prevented from contracting a noxious impregnation of metallic salts, and the vessel from being corroded and otherwise damaged by the salts caking on the bottom of it. 6. The producing a quantity of sweet and wholesome water, perfectly agreeable to the taste, and sufficient for all the purposes of shipping. 7. The taking advantage of the distilling the ship's provisions, so as to distil a very considerable quantity of water from the vapour, which would otherwise be lost, without any addition of fuel. To sum up the merits of this method in a few words: The use of a simple tube, of the most easy construction, applicable to any ship's kettle. The rejecting all ingredients; ascertaining the proportion of water to be distilled, with every advantage of quality, saving of fuel, and preservation of boilers. The obtaining fresh water, wholesome, palatable, and in sufficient quantities. Taking advantage of the vapour which ascends in the kettle while the ship's provisions are boiling. All these advantages are obtained by the above mentioned simple addition to the common ship's kettles. But Dr Irving proposes to introduce two further improvements. The first is a hearth, or stove, so constructed that the fire which is kept up the whole day for the common buttends of the ship serves likewise for distillation; whereby a sufficient quantity of water for all the economical purposes of the ship may be obtained, with a very inconsiderable addition to the expense of fuel. The other improvement is that of substituting, even in the largest ships, cast-iron boilers, of a new construction, in the place of coppers.

As soon as sea-water is put into the boiler, the tube directions is to be fitted either into the top or lid, round which, if for distillation necessary, a bit of wet linen may be applied, to make it fit close to the mouth of the vessel; there will be no occasion for luting, as the tube acts like a funnel in carrying rying off the vapour. When the water begins to boil, the vapour should be allowed to pass freely for a minute, which will effectually clean the tube and upper part of the boiler. The tube is afterwards to be kept constantly wet, by passing a mop or swab, dipped in sea water, along its upper surface. The waste water running from the mop may be carried off by means of a board made like a spout, and placed beneath the tube. The distillation may be continued till three-fourths of the water be drawn off, and no further. This may be ascertained either by a gauge-rod put into the boiler, or by measuring the water distilled. The brine is then to be let out. Water may be distilled in the same manner while the provisions are boiling. When the tube is made on shore, the best substance for the purpose is thin copper well tinned, this being more durable in long voyages than tin-plates. Instead of mopping, the tube, if required, may have a cage made also of copper, so much larger in diameter as to admit a thin sheet of water to circulate between them by means of a spiral copper thread, with a pipe of an inch diameter at each end of the cage; the lower for receiving cold water, and the upper for carrying it off when heated.

When only a very small portion of room can be conveniently allowed for distillation, the machine (n° 2.), which is only 27 inches long, may be substituted, as was done in this voyage. The principal intention of this machine, however, is to distil rum and other liquors; for which purpose it has been employed with extraordinary success, in preventing an empyreuma, or fiery taste.

Figure 1. represents in perspective a section of the two boilers taken out of the frame. In the back part at D, E, are seen openings for the cocks. On the top is a distilling tube A, B, C, five inches diameter at A, and decreasing in size to three inches at C; the length from B to C is five feet. Near C is a ring to prevent the water which is applied to the surface from mixing with the distilled water. In the inside of the tube, below B, is a small lip or ledge, to hinder the distilled water from returning into the boiler by the rolling of the ship.

In figure 2. A, B, C, D, represent a vertical section of a copper box, 27 inches long, seven inches wide, and 11 in height, tinned on the inside. In the bottom F is an aperture about six inches in diameter, having a ring to fit on the still or boiler. The dotted lines which run nearly horizontal, are vessels of thin copper, tinned on the outside, two feet long, seven inches wide, and three quarters of an inch deep. At G is a funnel to receive cold water, which is conveyed into the vessels by communicating pipes, contrived in such a manner as to form a complete and quick circulation of the water through their whole extent. When the water is become hot by the action of the steam, it is discharged by the horizontal pipe at A. E is a pipe from which the distilled water or spirits run, and is bent in such a form that the liquor running from it acts as a valve, and hinders any steam from escaping that way. On the top of the box, at H, is a safety-valve, which prevents any danger from a great accumulation of vapour not condensed for want of a proper supply of cold water.

We shall now mention a different method, discovered by the Chevalier Lorgna, by congelation of sea-water. Sea-water requires a very great degree of cold in order to become ice. Our author found that a freezing mixture, made by mixing three parts of pounded ice with two parts of common salt, was quite sufficient to freeze it. The cold produced by this mixture is equal to about 4° below that of Fahrenheit's thermometer.

A quantity of sea-water is never entirely congealed, a portion of it always remaining fluid; and, what is very remarkable, this fluid part is incomparably more full of salt and more nauseous than the rest; hence, if this be separated from the congealed part, the latter on being melted will be found to contain much less salt than it did before congelation. This we shall call the water of the first purification.

If the water of the first purification be again congealed, a part of it will remain fluid as in the first operation. This fluid portion will contain a greater proportion of salt than the rest, which is of course more pure, and, being melted, forms the water of the second purification. Thus, by repeatedly freezing the same sea-water, and separating the fluid from the congealed part in every operation, it is at last perfectly purified, so as to be entirely divested of salt, and as fit for drink and other purposes as the purest water that is used.

At first the sea-water, in order to be congealed, requires a very great degree of cold, as mentioned above, the ice formed in it consists rather of scales or filaments than of a compact body, and the quantity of the fluid parts bears a considerable proportion to the quantity of ice. But as the water, by undergoing the successive congelations, becomes more and more pure, so it becomes capable of being congealed by a smaller and smaller degree of cold; the ice is at the same time more compact, and in greater quantity; the fluid part at last becoming very inconsiderable.

Sea-Weed, or Alga Marina, is commonly used as a manure on the sea-coast, where it can be procured in abundance. The best sort grows on rocks, and is that from which kelp is made. The next to this is called the peaty sea-weed; and the worst is that with a long stalk. In the neighbourhood of Berwick, the farmers mix it with stable-dung and earth, and thus obtain a great quantity of excellent manure. Sea-weed is found also to be a very fit manure for gardens, as it not only enriches them, but destroys the vermin by which they are usually infested.

Sea-Wolf. See Anarhichas.

Saltmef of the Sea. See Sea-Water.

South Sea. See Pacific Ocean, and South Sea.