or DOWAY, a large and strong city of the French Netherlands, situated in E. Long. 3° 0' N. Lat. 50° 25'. It is situated on the river Scarpe, in a very fertile and pleasant country. The town is large and well fortified, and contains 18,000 inhabitants. You enter it by six gates, and the streets from each of these gates lead to the market-place. Here is a venerable old town-house, adorned with the statues of the earl of Flanders, in which the magistrates used to assemble. Here also were held several country courts for the dependencies of Douay, which contained about 30 villages. The parliament of Douay was at first only a supreme council, established at Tournay in 1668, and erected into a parliament in 1686. But Tournay being taken by the allies in 1709, the parliament was removed to Cambrai; and upon the yielding of Tournay to the Austrians by the treaty of Utrecht, the parliament was removed to Douay, where it still continues. This city was erected into an university like that of Louvain by Philip II., because of its being in the middle of so many great cities, and Louvain at so great a distance, that the children on that side of the country were generally sent for their education into France. Before the French revolution it contained 14 colleges, all governed and settled after the manner of those at Louvain; and the schools of philosophy, canon and civil law, and physic, were disposed also after the same manner. There was a considerable seminary here of English Roman Catholics, founded by Philip II. of Spain about the year 1560. There were also a great number of convents; and amongst the rest two English, one of Franciscan friars, the other of Benedictine monks. Douay was taken from the Spaniards by the French king in person in 1667, after a short resistance. That prince made it very strong, and built a fort about a cannon shot below it upon the Scarpe, with sluices, by which the adjacent country could be drowned. The allies laid siege to it in 1710, under the command of the duke of Marlborough; and after a vigorous defence, the town and Fort Scarpe surrendered upon honourable terms. It was retaken by the French in 1712, after the suspension of arms between Great Britain and France.

**DOUBLE;** two of a sort, one corresponding to the other.

**DOUBLE Children,** Double Cats, Double Pears, &c. Instances of these are frequent in the Philosoph. Trans. and elsewhere. See Monster.

Sir John Floyer, in the same Transactions, giving an account of a double turkey, furnishes some reflections on the production of double animals in general. Two turkeys, he relates, were taken out of an egg of the common size, when the rest were all hatched, which grew together by the flesh of the breast-bone, but in all other parts were distinct. They seemed less than the ordinary size, as wanting bulk, nutriment, and room for their growth; which latter, too, was apparently the occasion of their cohesion. For having two distinct cavities in their bodies, and two hearts, they must have arisen from two cicatriculae; and, consequently, the egg had two yolks; which is an uncommon accident. He mentions a dried double chicken in his possession, which, though it had four legs, four wings, &c. had but one cavity in the body, one heart, and one head; and, consequently, was produced from one cicatricula.

So, Parcus mentions a double infant, with only one heart, in which case, the original or stamen of the infant was one, and the vessels regular; only, the nerves and arteries towards the extremities dividing into more branches than ordinary, produced double parts.

The same is the case in the double flowers of plants, occasioned by the richness of the soil. So it is in the eggs of quadrupeds, &c.

There are, therefore, two reasons of duplicity in embryos: 1. The conjoining or connection of two perfect animals; and, 2. An extraordinary division and ramification of the original vessels, nerves, arteries, &c.

**DOUBLE Employment,** in Music, a name given by M. Rameau to the two different manners in which the chord of the sub-dominant may be regarded and treated, viz. as the fundamental chord of the sixth superadded, or as the chord of the great sixth, inverted from a fundamental chord of the seventh. In reality, the chords carry exactly the same notes, are figured in the same manner, are employed upon the same chord of the tone, in such a manner, that frequently we cannot discern which of the two chords the author employs, but by the assistance of the subsequent chord, which resolves it, and which is different in these different cases.

To make this distinction, we must consider the diatonic progress of the two notes which form the fifth and the sixth, and which, constituting between them the interval of a second, must one or the other constitute the dissonance of the chord. Now this progress is determined by the motion of the bass. Of these two notes, then, if the superior be the dissonance, it will rise by one gradation into the subsequent chord, the lower note will keep its place, and the higher note will be a superadded sixth. If the lower be the dissonance, it will descend into the subsequent chord, the higher will remain in its place, and the chord will be that of the great sixth. See the two cases of the double employment in Rousseau's Musical Dictionary, Plate D, fig. 12.

With respect to the composer, the use which he may make of the double employment, is to consider the chord in its different points of view, that from thence he may know how to make his entrance to it, and his exit from it; so that having arrived, for instance, at the chord of the superadded sixth, he may resolve it as a chord of the great sixth, and reciprocally.

M. D'Alembert has shown, that one of the chief uses of the double employment is, that we be able to carry the diatonic succession of the gamut even to an octave, without changing the mode, at least whilst we rise; for in descending we must change it. Of this gamut and its fundamental bass, an example will be found in Rousseau's Musical Dictionary, Plate D, fig. 13. It is evident, according to the system of M. Rameau, that all the harmonic successions which result from it, are in the same tone: for, in strictness, no other chords are there employed but three, that of the tonic, that of the dominant, and that of the sub-dominant; as this last, in the double employment, constitutes the seventh from the second note, which is employed upon the sixth.

With respect to what M. D'Alembert adds in his Elements of Music, p. 70, and which he repeats in the Encyclopédie, article Double emploi, viz. that the chord of the seventh re fa la ut, though we should even regard it only as inversion of fa la ut re, cannot be followed by the chord ut mi sol ut; "I cannot (says Rousseau) be of his opinion in this point.

The proof which he gives for it is, that the dissonance ut of the first cannot be resolved in the second; and this is true, since it remains in its place: but in this chord of the seventh re fa la ut, inverted from this chord of the superadded sixth, fa la ut re, it is not the ut, but the re, which is the dissonance; which, of consequence, ought to be resolved in ascending upon mi, as it really does in the subsequent chord; so that this procedure in the bass itself is forced, which, from re, cannot without an error return to ut, but ought to ascend to mi, in order to resolve the dissonance.

"M." M. D'Alembert afterwards shows, that this chord re fa la ut, when preceded and followed by that of the tonic, cannot be authorized by the double employment; and this is likewise very true; because this chord, though figured with a 7, is not treated as a chord of the seventh, neither when we make our entrance to it, nor our exit from it; or at least that it is not necessary to treat it as such, but simply as an inversion of the superadded sixth, of which the dissonance is the bass: in which case we ought by no means to forget, that this dissonance is never prepared. Thus, though in such a transition the double employment is not in question, though the chord of the seventh be no more than apparent, and impossible to be resolved by the rules, this does not hinder the transition from being proper and regular, as I have just proved to theorists. I shall immediately prove to practical artists, by an instance of this transition: which certainly will not be condemned by any one of them, nor justified by any other fundamental bass except my own. (See the Musical Dictionary, Plate D, fig. 14.)

I acknowledge, that this inversion of the chord of the sixth superadded, which transfers the dissonance to the bass, has been censured by M. Ramexu. This author, taking for a fundamental chord the chord of the seventh, which results from it, rather chose to make the fundamental bass descend diatonically, and resolve one seventh by another, than to unfold this seventh by an inversion. I had dissipated this error, and many others, in some papers which long ago had passed into the hands of M. D'Alembert, when he was composing his Elements of Music; so that it is not his sentiments which I attack, but my own opinion which I defend.

For what remains, the double employment cannot be used with too much reserve, and the greatest masters are the most temperate in putting it in practice.

**Double Fichy**, or **Fiche**, in Heraldry, the denomination of a cross, when the extremity has two points; in contradistinction to **fiche**, where the extremity is sharpened away to one point.

**Double Octave**, in Music, an interval composed of fifteen notes in diatonic progression; and which, for that reason, is called a fifteenth. "It is (says Rousseau) an interval composed of two octaves, called by the Greeks disdiapason."

It deserves, however, to be remarked, that in intervals less distant and compounded, as in the third, the fifth, the simple octave, &c., the lowest and highest extremes are included in the number from whence the interval takes its name. But, in the double octave, when termed a fifteenth, the simple number of which it is composed gives the name. This is by no means analogical, and may occasion some confusion. We should rather choose, therefore, to run any hazard which might occur from uniformly including all the terms of which the component intervals consist, and call the double octave a sixteenth, according to the general analogy. See INTERVAL.

**Doublet**, among lapidaries, implies a counterfeit stone, composed of two pieces of crystal, and sometimes glass softened, together with proper colours between them; so that they make the same appearance to the eye as if the whole substance of the crystal had been tinged with these colours.

The impracticability of imparting tinges to the body of crystals, while in their proper and natural state, and the softness of glass, which renders ornaments made of it greatly inferior in wear to crystal, give inducements to the introduction of colouring the surface of crystal wrought in a proper form, in such a manner, that the surfaces of two pieces so coloured being laid together, the effect might appear the same as if the whole surface of the crystal had been coloured. The crystals, and sometimes white transparent glass so treated, were called doublets; and at one time prevailed greatly in use, on account of the advantages, with respect to wear, such doublets had, when made of crystal over glass, and the brightness of the colours which could with certainty be given to counterfeit stones this way, when coloured glass could not be procured, or at least not without a much greater expense. Doublets have not indeed the property which the others have, of bearing to be set transparent, as is frequently required in drops of ear-rings and other ornaments; but when mounted in rings, or used in such manner that the sides of the pieces where the joint is made, cannot be inspected, they have, when formed of crystal, the title to a preference to the coloured glass; and the art of managing them is therefore, in some degree, of the same importance with that of preparing glass for the counterfeiting gems; and is therefore properly an appendage to it, as being entirely subservient to the same intention. The manner of making doublets is as follows:

Let the crystal or glass be first cut by the lapidaries in the manner of a brilliant, except that, in this case, the figure must be composed from two separate stones, or parts of stones, formed in the manner of the upper and under parts of a brilliant, if it was divided into a horizontal direction, a little lower than the middle. After the two plates of the intended stone are thus cut, and fitted so exactly that no division can appear when they are laid together, the upper part must be polished ready for setting; and then the colour must be put betwixt the two plates by this method. "Take of Venice or Cyprus turpentine two scruples; and add to it one scruple of the grains of mastich chosen perfectly pure, free from foulness, and previously powdered. Melt them together in a small silver or brass spoon, ladle, or other vessel, and put to them gradually any of the coloured substances mentioned below, being first well powdered; stirring them together as the colour is put in, that they may be thoroughly commixed. Warm then the doublets to the same degree of heat as the melted mixture; and paint the upper surface of the lower part, and put the upper one instantly upon it, pressing them to each other, but taking care that they may be conjoined in the most perfectly even manner. When the cement or paint is quite cold and set, the redundant part of it, which has been pressed out of the joint of the two pieces, should be gently scraped off the side, till there be no appearance of any colour on the outside of the doublets; and they should then be skilfully set; observing to carry the mounting over the joint, that the upper piece may be well secured from separating from the under one.

The colour of the ruby may be best imitated, by mixing a fourth part of carmine with some of the finest crimson lake that can be procured. The sapphire may be counterfeited with very bright Prussian blue, mixed with a little of the above-mentioned crimson lake, to give it a cast of the purple. The Prussian blue should not be very deep coloured, or but little of it should be used: for otherwise, it will give a black shade that will be injurious to the lustre of the doublets.

The emerald may be well counterfeited with distilled verdigrise, to which is added a little powdered aloes. But the mixture should not be strongly heated, or kept long over the fire after the verdigrise is added: for the colour is apt to be soon impaired by it.

The resemblance of the garnet may be made with dragon's blood; which, if it cannot be procured of sufficient brightness, may be helped by a very small quantity of carmine.

The amethyst may be imitated with the mixture of some Prussian blue with the crimson lake; but the proportions can only be regulated, by direction, as different parcels of the lake and Prussian blue vary extremely in the degree of strength of the colour.

The yellow topazes may be counterfeited by mixing the powdered aloes with a little dragon's blood, or by good Spanish anatto; but the colour must be very sparingly used, or the tinge will be too strong for the appearance of that stone.

The chrysolite, hyacinth, vinegar garnet, aigue marine, and other such weaker or more dilated colours, may be formed in the same manner, by lessening the proportions of the colours, or by compounding them together correspondently to the hue of the stone to be imitated; to which end it is proper to have an original stone, or an exact imitation of one, at hand when the mixture is made, in order to the more certain adapting the colours to the effect desired: and when these precautions are taken, and the operation is well conducted, it is practicable to bring the doublets to so near a resemblance of the true stone, that even the best judges cannot distinguish them, when well set, without a peculiar manner of inspection.

There is, however, an easy method of distinguishing doublets, which is only to behold them betwixt the eye and light, in such a position, that the light may pass through the upper part and corners of the stone; when it will easily be perceived that there is no colour in the body of the stone.