a sect amongst the Jews at the time of our Saviour. The critics and commentators are very much divided with regard to the Herodians. St Jerome, in his dialogue against the Luciferians, takes the name to have been given to those who owned Herod as the Messiah; and Tertullian and Epiphanius are of the same opi- But the same Jerome, in his Commentary on St Matthew, treats his opinion as ridiculous, and maintains that the Pharisees gave this appellation by way of ridicule to Herod's soldiers, who paid tribute to the Romans; and accordingly the Syrian interpreters render the word by the domestics of Herod, that is, his courtiers. Simon, in his notes on the twenty-second chapter of St Matthew, advances a more probable opinion. The name Herodian he imagines to have been given to such as adhered to Herod's party and interest, and were for preserving the government in his family, about which were great divisions amongst the Jews. Hardouin represents the Herodians and Sadducees as the same. Dr Prideaux is of opinion that they derived their name from Herod the Great, and that they were distinguished from the other Jews by their concurrence with Herod's scheme of subjecting himself and his dominions to the Romans, and likewise by complying with many of their heathen usages and customs. This symbolizing with idolatry upon views of interest and worldly policy was probably that leaven of Herod against which our Saviour cautioned his disciples. It is further probable that they were chiefly of the sect of Sadducees, because the leaven of Herod is also denominated the leaven of the Sadducees.