In this our concluding article on weighing instruments, we intend to supply such particulars as have not already been treated of under the heads of Balance and Mechanics. In doing so, we propose, in the first instance, to sketch shortly, and possibly with some novelty, the early history of the invention, which claims attention from the high antiquity it holds among the mechanical arts; and then to furnish descriptive notices of several balances, some of them of recent date, and not described, it is believed, or at least collectively so, in any previous work. The most ancient instrument used for ascertaining weight, and the one from which the others were derived, was probably the common or equal-armed balance. It may have been invented much about the same period as the yoke or swing-trap employed to attach two beasts of burden to a common load. Both inventions were nearly allied in construction; their approximation in the nature of the object to be elected by their instrumentality, leaves little doubt that those originated the idea of the other. In their first rude fashion, they seem to have been indiscriminately used, both for weighing and equably dividing the labour of draft.
Accordingly, the Greek words ζωδίας and ζωδίας, and their Latin derivative jugum, were employed to signify either the balance or yoke. In the Hebrew, the word used in the oldest books of Scripture to denote the balance, is one which is descriptive of the instrument itself, by having reference, through related words, to weighing and the ascertainment of weight; while the word for yoke, without having any descriptive reference to any instrument, signifies literally upon; seemingly in allusion to an already known contrivance being laid as a yoke, over or upon the necks of the two draft cattle; a custom which still prevails in Egypt, as it anciently did in all countries. From the analogy furnished by the double application of the Greek and Latin terms, it may be concluded, that the beam of the balance was the instrument thus apparently referred to, and that it was therefore the earlier invention of the two.
That the balance was the first of strictly mechanical contrivances, is not perhaps improbable. Its great antiquity is attested by its being the only machine commemorated among the twelve signs. The name bestowed by the Greeks and Romans on this girdle of constellations was ζωδίας, zodiac, a word having reference exclusively to living creatures. The balance being an inanimate object, seems therefore to have been long rejected by them, and its place supplied by giving to Scorpio a double share of the heavens; the twelve names being then completed by applying the word Chelos, to denote that half of the sign into which the two claws of the animal extended. The introduction of Libra, or the balance, does not seem to have been fully sanctioned even in Virgil's time; for although elsewhere named by him, he describes its place as offering a favourable vacancy for the reception of Caesar among the constellations; and poetically figures the scorpion's claws already contracting to make room for him.
The ancient claims of the balance were however revived, and the name of Chelos disappeared from the number of the signs. Among other nations, the balance held its place in the zodiac from the highest antiquity. Along with the other signs, it is sculptured on the most ancient monuments of Egypt; but that this was not their birth-place, may be inferred from the contrast between the figures of the signs in those native and strangely fantastic devices with which the Egyptian monuments are otherwise so profusely covered. The Abbé Pluche, arguing from another circumstance, viz. the non-accordance of the seasons in Egypt with those which he considers the signs as marking, traces their invention to the plains of Shinar, and refers it to the near descendants of Noah. The annexed figure represents an ancient and well-formed balance from Egyptian sculpture. For the sake of distinctness, however, it is here shown as off the equilibrium. A line and plummet hang from the beam, to mark when a tongue, which points downward, reaches the vertical position.
Others, of a much ruder description, and without any contrivance to indicate equilibrium, are given by Rosellini, from ancient Egyptian paintings.
The steelyard has generally been regarded as of greater antiquity than the common balance; but in point of conception it is less simple, and likely therefore to have been of subsequent invention. The correctness of this inference admits perhaps of being fully established. In Job and the Pentateuch, by much the oldest records extant, the Hebrew term employed to denote the balance is moznaim, a word of plural, or, as pointed by the Masorites, dual import. The kind of balance intended by it can be no other therefore than the common one; the dual word moznaim evidently bearing reference to the two scales. That it cannot mean the steelyard, appears to be clear, because in it only one scale was required, while in every respect it is destitute of any double member from which a dual name could have arisen. This view, which appears to be decisive, is confirmed by the definition given of the word by Gesenius, who explains it to mean the balance, properly a pair of scales.
The common balance being therefore the one mentioned in Job, is ascertained to have been in use 2130 years B.C., or 218 years after the deluge. How much earlier than this it may have been used, cannot safely be conjectured. The knowledge of it probably came down through Noah's family, from antediluvian times; for without some means of ascertaining weight, the ordinary transactions of every-day traffic could not in any age have been carried on.
From the preceding observations, it appears likely that any allusion to the steelyard in the Bible should be made by a noun possessing a strictly singular termination. The earliest use of such a word having reference to the subject, is in the time of Solomon, about 1014 years B.C. It occurs in Proverbs, xvi. 11, where the term phelos (explained by Gesenius, p. 643, to be a balance, equipoise, properly a steelyard) is followed by the word moznaim, already noticed. In the English version, this passage is translated a just weight? and balance, &c. A more correct rendering would be, a just balance and scales; first, because phelos has been preserved in the Arabic to the present day as meaning, not a weight, but a weighing instrument; and, secondly, because the word occurs again in Scripture, viz. Isaiah, xl. 12, where its sense is fixed by the immediate context.
Archdeacon Woodhouse (on the Apocalypse, 1805, p. 144), in explaining some peculiar views in regard to the translation of the Greek ζωδίας, gives priority to the yoke, rather incidentally perhaps than otherwise, since the question of date does not affect his argument.
Gesenius, p. 32.
Pluche, Histoire du Ciel, Paris, 1739, v. i. pp. 18–30. A short memoir of this author will be found in its proper place in a former volume of the present work.
In nine passages of our version of the Bible, moznaim is translated in the plural balances, and in seven passages balances. Were the term employed for the plural rendering, and pair of scales for the singular, the English would express the original with much fidelity.
Leo's Gesenius, Cambridge, 1825, p. 386. The argument (in support of which Gesenius is here quoted) receives similar confirmation from the Greek, in which the singulars ζωδίας and ζωδίας were generally employed to denote the yoke, and their plurals the balance.
The chronology here followed is the common one, adopted and specially vindicated in this instance by Townsend (Chronological Arrangement of the Old Testament, 1826, v. i. p. 28). Dr Andrew, in his Scripture Chronology, 1822, p. 33, dates the time of Job 2215 years before Dr Hales, in his Analysis, vol. i. p. 185, 2337 B.C.
Among the Hebrews, as among the Greeks, the shekel, maneh, and talent, were names of particular weights, by which their money and precious articles were weighed. The Hebrew word for commercial or general weight was ebes, literally a stone, and ebenim, in the plural, stones; probably the origin of the term stoneweight. Weighing context. In this passage, as in the former instance, the word *pheles* precedes *moznaim*, both words being brought together, and occurring in a parallelism. The passage referred to is rendered in our version, "who hath weighed the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance." The word here rendered scales in the plural, is the singular noun *pheles*; while that rendered balance, is the dual word *moznaim*. The English therefore would better accord with the original, were the terms in the translation reversed in order, and read thus: "who hath weighed the mountains in a balance, and the hills in scales."
Whether *pheles*, however, means properly a steelyard, as Gesenius defines it, may be doubted. The reason for supposing it does, seems apparently to rest on the circumstance that *kaphelos* in the Arabic (most probably a corruption of *kaphelos*, the definite form of the Hebrew word) is the name of the Arabian weighing instrument of the present day; and because it now is a steelyard, and is known to have been in long and almost exclusive use in Arabia, and indeed in all Asia, that therefore the related or parent word *pheles* must denote the steelyard. But this rests on the assumption that the common balance had never been known to the Arabians. Job, however, who is shewn to have been an Idumean Arab, and to have resided in the north of Arabia, does not use *pheles*, but *moznaim*, to express the balance; a word which, as already shewn, denotes the common or equal-armed one, and at that period of course undoubtedly used in Arabia.
Perhaps both words may therefore be regarded as synonymous terms for the common balance; the one descriptive of it by reference to its beam or balance-rod, and the other by reference to its pair of scales. This view receives further confirmation from the circumstance that there is one Hebrew word in the Bible which may be shewn to refer with some distinctness to the steelyard. Isaiah, in a passage subsequent to that above quoted, when describing the construction of idol images, says, "they (the Babylonians) weigh silver in the balance," &c. (chap. xlvi. 6); and here makes use of the Hebrew word *kaneh* to denote the kind of balance meant. Gesenius, p. 699, explains this word to be a cane, or measuring reed, or scale for measure; a beam or lever of a balance, or balance itself. The word has thus evident reference to a graduated staff or beam, and probably therefore when used, as in the present instance, to express a weighing instrument, denotes rather the graduated steelyard, of which it is thus descriptive, than an ordinary balance or pair of scales. As it is not used to express a weighing instrument in any other passage of the Bible, and as Isaiah is here giving a minutely graphic picture of the process observed by the Babylonians in the manufacture and correct adjustment of the weight of their gods, it is probable that the instrument named was an eastern invention, constructed in all likelihood of the sugar or "sweet cane," a sense in which the word *kaneh* is also used. These remarks appear to receive some illustration from the fact, that in China and the East Indies a small steelyard (described in our article Balance, p. 306) is employed to weigh precious metals, gems, &c.; and to this day is made of wood or ivory, and not improbably also of cane, a substance which, from its combined lightness and strength, is well suited for the purpose.
This is probably the first mention of the steelyard on record, viz. in Isaiah's time, or about 780 years B.C.; at which period it thus appears to have been in use among the Babylonians. It seems to have superseded the common balance in Asia; and, through the Romans, to have come into extensive use in Europe. The annexed figure is a representation of one made in the first century, and not long since recovered from the ruins of Pompeii, which town, with many of its inhabitants and their utensils, lay buried, for nearly eighteen centuries, in the shower of volcanic matter thrown out by Vesuvius, A.D. 79. Like some of our steelyards, this ancient one is provided with two different centres of suspension. It wants however the knife-edged bearers now universally used. In the progress of invention, the modifications of the steelyard have become numerous in the form of compound machines; but these are of comparatively modern date, and do not require successive detail. Descriptions of the most useful varieties of the balance will be found here, and under our previous articles on the subject; and as it is intended to embrace the present opportunity of classifying their different kinds under distinct heads, references to those already described will be introduced in their proper place.
I. Balances acting as Levers round one or more Fulcrums, requiring experimental Adjustment when used to ascertain the Weight of a Substance.
To this class belong the Common, the Roman, the Chinese or Indian, the Danish or Swedish, already described under Balance and Mechanics, pp. 358 and 370; and Magellan's, Mr Bate's, and Dr Black's, under Mechanics, pp. 371 and 456.
This is a compound steelyard, and is used for ascertaining the weight of loaded carts. The apparatus, of which a ground-plan is here given, is arranged in a box ABCD, which is about twelve inches deep, and is sufficiently sunk in the ground to place the highest part of the completed machine on a level with the line of road. A fixed wooden bridge, by which the horse may pass across the machine, is laid over the middle part of the box. At each side of this bridge is a metal wheel-track. On these the cart is rested by its two wheels and a prop-staff. The tracks are fixed to and borne up by a platform (or skeleton frame) placed below the wooden bridge, but above the works. The platform has four short feet, the lower ends of which are formed into small hemispherical cavities. These cavities rest at E, F, G, H, on pointed studs about an inch long. The two studs at E and F are fixed on the crooked lever AKB, with their points upward, and the two at G and H are similarly fixed on the companion-lever DIC. Sharpened studs, also about an inch long, project downward from the four extremities of the crooked levers. The points of these studs rest in small hemispherical cavities, formed at the upper ends of blocks which are fixed as bearers for them in each corner of the box. The short parts of the crooked levers parallel to OL, and near the middle of the box, have their under edges sharpened, and rest on the angle of a sustaining fulcrum IK, which passes through, and is fixed to the lever OM. This lever is also crossed at L by the fulcrum which forms the common centre of movement for the whole machine. The angle of the fulcrum points downward, and rests, as in the ordinary
---
1 Horne's Critical Study of the Scriptures, 1825, v. iv, pp. 74, 75. 2 In this sense it occurs in many passages. Thus, Ezekiel, xi. 3-5: "With a line of six in his hand, and a measuring reed...and in the man's hand a measuring reed of six cubits long; so he measured the breadth of the building," &c. 3 Thus, in Jeremiah, vi. 20: "To what purpose cometh there to me incense from Sheba, and the sweet cane from a far country? your burnt-offerings are not acceptable, nor your sacrifices sweet unto me." 4 Job, vi. 2, and xxii. 6. II. Self-adjusting Balances, which derive their Power of progressive Resistance from Properties strictly mechanical.
Under this head we place Ludlam's balance, introduced about 1760, and an improved modification of it, named the bent lever. Ludlam's is described under Mechanics, p. 371, and the bent lever under the article Balance.
This balance, by Mr Brady of London, is provided with Brady's different points of suspension for the scale, and is a modification of the bent lever one. In the upper end of its lever are three cavities, at different distances from the centre of movement, from any of which the scale may be hung. For each cavity there is a separately graduated arc. The three arcs are placed one above another, and move through an opening in the bar or shears which carries the receiving scale, the edge of the bar serving the purpose of a pointer. When the scale is hung from the cavity next the upper end of the lever, the beam becomes horizontal, each ounce, as far as two pounds, being indicated on the upmost arc. When hung from the middle cavity, each alternate ounce, as far as eleven pounds, is indicated on the middle arc; and when hung from the remaining cavity, each quarter pound, as far as thirty pounds, is indicated on the lowest arc. In point of principle it differs from the bent lever thus far, that the acting mass of the counterpoise is altered (for the most part increased) by the accumulating weight of the graduated arcs and their strengthening stays as they pass the vertical line from the centre.
The balance by Mr Dampier of Ware is in this respect the reverse of Mr Brady's. Here a circular disc or wheel patent is employed, which, as it turns on its centre, is balanced in any position, and therefore neither adds to nor diminishes the acting mass of the counterpoise, which is hinged on a round stud placed in the rim of the disc. The scale is similarly attached to the rim of the disc, a little more than a quarter circumference intervening between the two studs. The pointer is formed in the suspending frame or stand which supports the axis, and the graduations are marked on the upper part of the circle. This construction is a modification both of the bent lever and Ludlam's balance, and, in cases where the weights to be examined are of small amount, is preferable to the former.
The foregoing self-adjusting balances are placed together, as being nearly allied, and having a similar extent of movement, viz. something short of a quadrant.
In this balance (manufactured by Messrs Milne, Edinburgh), the opposing arms are formed of grooved eccentric, patent or spiral curves. These are acted on by the cords or flat revolving chains which suspend the counterpoise and receiving scale, and are thus caused to move round on their common axis, which is placed in the pole of the curves. In the annexed figure the dial is supposed to be transparent, and being fixed in front to the curved balance, moves along with it. The pointer is stationary, and is fastened to the shears or fork which suspends the balance, and indicates on the dial as it passes round. By the changes of leverage which occur in the course of revolution, the counterpoise rises from a small power to a greater; while the scale, in proportion as it becomes loaded, contracts throughout from a greater leverage to a less. This general Weighing principle of combined changes of leverage affords a favourable means of employing an unchanging weight to balance others, both greater and less than itself; and at the same time admits of the parts necessary to produce powerful and sustained resistance being practically formed within convenient compass. The self-adjusting power thus generally obtained is regulated in the rate of its increase by a definite construction of the curves, which are formed to cause equable as well as progressive resistance, by which means the balance is moved through equal angles by equal weights. The graduated scale extends to three quadrants, more or less. The chief advantage of the balance is, that it combines this lengthened primary movement with equable graduation and unyielding mechanical construction. The different sizes of which it is made have each an appropriate form of curve. The least is fitted for the minute subdivision of small weights; the next indicates to four or sixteen ounces; and larger sizes range to twenty, fifty, 100 pounds and upward. In the adjoining figure, the spiral arms, which before are in the same vertical plane, and merge into one continuous curve, here occupy different planes; but being united by an intermediate rod, which passes through the upright of the stand, they have simultaneous movement. The dial is fixed to the bearing-frame, and the pointer is carried round by the axis. The graduation, which in this form may be prolonged to any desirable extent, occupies a full circuit. In other respects, the description already given is alike explanatory of both balances. There are some minutiae which give refinement to their action; but as these are used only in particular machines, they are not represented, and need not be described in detail. A delicately constructed modification of the instrument is also arranged to shew, on inspection, and without the use of eke-weights, the specific gravities and weights per cubic inch of different fluids.
III. Self-adjusting Balances, which derive their resisting Power from the Elasticity of Metals.
Under this head may be mentioned Coulomb's torsion-balance, formed of brass wire, the twisting and untwisting of which is applied to the measurement of small forces. It is described under Balance, p. 307, Hydrodynamics, p. 76, and Mechanics, p. 401. The dynamometer for the measurement of larger forces, and applicable also to the ascertainment of weight, is explained at the conclusion of the article Dynamics. That of Mr Veitch is represented and described in the article Agriculture, p. 353.
The spring is supposed to have been applied to the purposes of weighing about the year 1690 or 1700. About this period the dynamometers of Graham and Desaguliers were superseded, first by Monsieur Leroy's of the Academy of Sciences, who applied to the purpose the compression of a spiral spring; and next by Monsieur Regnier's, in which the distention of an elliptical one was adapted to the same end, both springs being then also in use as balances. The spring-balance is constructed in a variety of modified forms; but in all of them the weights under examination are caused either to bend a plain spring, or to compress or extend an elliptical, semi-elliptical, or spiral one; or both to compress and extend the spring when formed to admit of this. The amount to which any of these descriptions of spring yields to different stated weights, is shewn on a graduated scale properly situated for the purpose. The principle of extension is preferable to the other, inasmuch as it is put in operation by simpler and less complex means; and when the weights to be examined are large, the elliptical spring should be adopted; but when these are of a moderate amount, the spiral form is best. For many purposes the spring-balance is a convenient instrument, but not a lasting one. The spring, when fresh and unused, is equable in its successive yieldings, but is liable to variations, which cause it gradually to lose correspondence with the divisions. It is affected by temperature, and weakened by use; and if overstrained or corroded, its power and quality are materially changed. In some balances an extra spring is introduced to adjust these irregularities; but this should be omitted, as its operation increases the chance of error, without removing the cause; for though the pointer, when displaced, may be restored by it to zero, there are then two acting springs changed in position, quality, and strain, while the line of graduations remains as it was derived from the original elasticity of the leading spring.
In this balance, by Mr Marriott of London, the spring is formed into an arbitrary curve, and is placed in a shallow brass box behind the dial, which latter is here supposed to be transparent; one end of the spring is fixed to the upper side of the box, and the other end to the head of the rod which carries the hook. Near the same point of this rod is also attached the head of the rack-plate, which, as the hook becomes loaded, is lowered by the spring and turns the pinion, and with it the pointer, which indicates the weight. When in use, the portion of the spring to the left is extended, and that to the right compressed; and during descent, the rack is kept in gear with the pinion by a screw-pin at its right side.
This balance, by Mr Salter of London, is represented in the annexed figure, the index-plate in front being supposed transparent. It is formed of a spiral spring, which is contained in the upper part of a cylindrical case, behind the index-plate. One extremity of the spring is fastened at the head of the instrument, and the other extremity is fixed to the rod which carries the pointer and the hook or scale. The spring extends in proportion as the hook is loaded; the pointer at the same time shewing the weight on the graduated front. Mr Salter subsequently made some alterations, which he patented; most of them however relate to minor details, and need not be described.
IV. Self-adjusting Balances, whose progressive Indications are regulated by the Properties of Fluids.
Under this head may be included several of the various instruments for ascertaining specific gravities, which are described under Hydrodynamics, p. 22–25. Although most of these require eke-weights to complete their range of indications, they are nevertheless of self-adjusting character; their principle of adjustment depending on the different depths to which fluids of varied density permit the graduated stem of the instruments to sink. Here also may be mentioned Mr Harris's electrometer, described under Electricity, p. 658, a balance in which the resistance is obtained by the accumulating power which an elongated counterpoise acquires when caused to emerge from a fluid; the same principle being further illustrated under the article Gas-Light, p. 353–54, where its application to the progressive balancing of the gasometer is explained.
This balance, by Mr Hawkins of London, consists of a cylindrical vessel open at top, on the face of which is a vertical glass tube also open above, and entering the cylinder at its base. Within this outer case is another hollow cylindrical drum, of rather smaller diameter, on the top of which is placed the receiving scale. The inner cylinder rests on the water which the outer one contains. In proportion as the scale is loaded, the water rises between the cylinders and in the glass tube, beside which is a graduated scale, the weight being indicated by the height which the fluid attains in the tube. The water carried off by evaporation should be replaced, as much being poured in from time to time as is required to preserve its surface at zero when the scale is empty. The continual effort of the inner cylinder to escape to the sides of the outer one is, however, a source of considerable friction; a slight displacement of the cylinder from the horizontal position, or the leaning of the scale more on one side of its centre than another, contributing to augment the evil.
This balance, by Mr Bursill of Islington, is formed in a variety of different modifications; some of them depending on stem or piston being caused to sink in a fluid, and others on its being caused to rise from one. It may however be generally described as consisting of two cylinders of different diameter united by a connecting tube. From the top of the smaller cylinder rises a glass tube, at the side of which is a moveable index-plate, on which the graduations are marked. Mercury is poured to some depth into the cylinders, the smaller of which, together with the lower part of the glass tube, is then filled up with oil or colored water, which rests on the surface of the mercury. A piston or stem, guided by a parallel movement, rises and falls in the larger mercurial holder. A counterpoise on one of the parallel rods balances the weight of the scale; when the latter is loaded, the displacement of mercury in the larger cylinder causes the water to rise in the tube by perceptible gradations, and indicate the weight. This balance is likewise arranged in various combinations with the steelyard, and two contrivances (one of which may be added to the machine) are provided with the view of compensating the irregularities caused by change of temperature. The cylinders for the mercury are formed of glass; and a stop-cock is placed at the head of the tube, to be opened during use to admit air, and closed afterwards to exclude dust and diminish evaporation.
This machine, by Captain Ericson of London, is represented in the annexed figure. It consists of a shallow circular box of cast iron, formed of two portions, an upper and lower one; the interior diameters of which are somewhat different. The lower half of the box contains a piston, the neck of which passes freely through an aperture in the bottom, and is screwed to the horizontal bar of the triangular suspending frame. A circular piece of India rubber cloth is laid over the face of the piston, and continued through between the joining rims of the iron box, the halves of which are then screwed together upon it. From the upper half of the box rises a hollow iron stem, sufficiently laid open to expose to view a glass tube, which it encloses in a bed of Paris plaster. Mercury is then introduced through the tube into the upper part of the box; and its escape being prevented by the cover, and the distention of this resisted by the piston, the box and stem are set afloat, and are kept from capsizing by a small pin from the top of the triangular frame, which enters into the bore of the upright stem. The hook is connected with the box, and, on being loaded, draws it down, thereby causing the ring of cloth exterior to the circumference of the piston to descend below the piston's surface; Weighing Machines—in effect thus contracting the space in the box, and forcing the mercury up the tube till it indicates the weight on the graduated scale. Two safety-screws in the lower bar are adjusted to prevent the box from descending so far as to eject the mercury from the tube; and, as in Mr Bursill's, a stop-cock is placed at the mouth, to be opened during use to admit air, and shut after it to exclude dust and diminish evaporation. In this machine, the primary movement must necessarily be extremely confined (about the 50th or 100th part of an inch), otherwise the cloth, by being overstretched, would give way. Any deviation from uniform action, however arising, and however trifling, is thus apt to occasion a magnified irregularity in the indication. The admission of dust and evaporation of mercury; the effort made by this fluid at all points to draw into globular formations, and avoid the minuter recesses of the holder; the change of temperature, and progressive distention and wrinkling of the cloth, are among the more immediate and least controllable sources of variation.
V. Letter and Post-Packet Balances.
Under this general title are enumerated such of the preceding as are applied to the purpose of weighing letters; descriptions of the balances not yet noticed being subjoined.
1. The Common, the Roman, and Danish balances; 2. the Bent-lever, Brady's, Dampier's, and Lothian's balances; 3. Salter's and other Spring-balances; 4. Bursill's balance, all as above described, are constructed also of sizes suited for letter-weights.
In this balance, which was devised for letter-weighing by Sir John Robison, secretary to the Royal Society, Edinburgh (and made by Mr Forbes there), the letter is placed on a circular ivory disc, which is supported by a steel wire, that passes freely through a small orifice in the ivory cap of a glass tube filled about a third of its depth with mercury. To the lower end of the wire is screwed a cylindrical ivory stem of larger diameter than the wire, and marked with circular graduations. This sinks in the fluid in proportion as the disc is loaded; and the vertical movement is preserved by guide-pins, which diverge from the lower extremity of the stem. A loose ring of ivory serves the purpose of a floating pointer, while it prevents the eye being deceived by the glance of the fluid, or the images occasioned by its reflecting powers. Shortly afterwards, letter-balances of similar description were made by Messrs Miller, Dundee; Lund, Fleet Street; Osler, Birmingham; and Bursill, Islington; the three latter being registered designs.
The remaining balances may properly be arranged by themselves, as a class formed to indicate periodical amounts of weight, but not their intermediate subdivisions.
In the balance by Mr Riddle of London, weights of an ounce each are rested on the successive steps of a pyramidal support. A ring attached to one arm of a balance registered lifts the lowest, and proceeds to the others in their order; the postage corresponding to the number of weights raised being indicated by a pointer. In Mr Gye's balance three rings fixed at proper heights give support to as many weights, which are attached by a small chain to the arm of a balance, each weight being lifted in succession, and the postage known by the number of weights raised. Mr Riddle's arrangement, however, provides for a more exact movement.
This balance, by Professor Willis, Cambridge (made by Messrs Hotzapfel), is formed of two beams joined at some patent distance apart, so as to form a rectangular frame, which the letter-figure of Pompadur's balance above described will serve to illustrate. Here also, as in that balance, the receiving scale