Census boundary evidence
Cap des Rosiers (Grande Grève) — 1921 census geography (QC)
This page identifies a census boundary representation. Source-table records below retain their own reporting-unit identity and geographic qualifications.
- Map snapshot identifier
- QC056004_1921
- Source boundary identifier
- QC056004
- Census vintage
- 1921
- Source label
- Cap des Rosiers (Grande Grève)
- Province code
- QC
- District label
- Gaspé
- Level
- csd
- Representation class
- E93_Presence
Census continuity group: Cap des Rosiers (Grande Grève)
TCP UID: QC056004
Census source records
Each link states the assessment that connected the source row to this map. Name candidates remain candidates; no source statistic is silently assigned to the map.
- Cap des Rosiers (Grande Grève) — 1921 · 1921_V1T16, row 1192 unique_contextual_name_candidate
- Cap des Rosiers (Grande Grève) — 1921 · 1921_V1T27, row 1191 unique_contextual_name_candidate
- Cap des Rosiers (Grande Grève) — 1921 · 1921_V1T38, row 1191 unique_contextual_name_candidate
Boundary intersections across censuses
These are computed polygon intersections in the equal-area CRS ESRI:102001. Fractions describe the area of the earlier and later polygons, respectively. They do not establish historical succession, and population has not been apportioned by area. All positive intersections are retained, including very small contributions.
| Other census representation | Years (earlier → later) | Overlap (m²) | Fraction of earlier area | Fraction of later area | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cap Rosier · 1911 | 1911 → 1921 | 34137431.70754226 | 0.36296280666992686 | 0.9999999309540379 | LATER_WITHIN_EARLIERHistorical succession verified: False |
| Gaspé Bay N. & Sydenham S. · 1911 | 1911 → 1921 | 0.7387628757304858 | 3.412733099040954e-09 | 2.164084372400726e-08 | PARTIAL_OVERLAPHistorical succession verified: False |
| L'Anse au Griffon · 1911 | 1911 → 1921 | 0.14698424104570867 | 3.827403910555623e-09 | 4.305661660673961e-09 | PARTIAL_OVERLAPHistorical succession verified: False |