{ "id": "c391b7479b72aaaa456d0bc87583db69418ab4ff", "text": "XXIII. An account of the re-measurement of the cube, cylinder, and sphere, used by the late Sir George Shuckburgh Evelyn, in his enquiries respecting a standard of weights and measures. By Captain Henry Kater, F. R. S.\n\nRead June 7, 1821.\n\nThe valuable experiments made by the late Sir George Shuckburgh Evelyn, for the determination of a standard of weights and measures, are detailed in the Philosophical Transactions for 1798. It may there be seen that a cube, a cylinder, and a sphere of brass were employed, the respective dimensions of which being given, as well as the weight of water displaced by each, the weight of a cubic inch of distilled water might thence be readily ascertained.\n\nIn reviewing these experiments, so much care appears to have been bestowed on those parts of the enquiry which relate to weight, as to leave no reason to doubt their accuracy; but as Sir George Shuckburgh has not entered into so full a detail of the method he pursued in the measurement of the cube, the cylinder, and the sphere, I felt it to be desirable that this operation should be repeated, before the Commissioners of Weights and Measures should make their final Report.\n\nThe Honourable Charles C. Jenkinson, to whom the valuable apparatus of the late Sir George Shuckburgh now belongs, very obligingly confided it to the care of the Commissioners. I found the sphere in the most perfect state of preservation. The cube and the cylinder were in some parts covered with an oxide, which was, however, readily removed without their sustaining any injury, by a very weak mixture of sulphuric acid and water.\nTwo small rectangular pieces of plate brass were prepared, of the same size, and about the tenth of an inch thick; one of the surfaces and one side of each were ground perfectly flat, and the surfaces being placed in contact, two fine dots were made on the plane sides, close to the edges, as in the accompanying figure. These pieces were intended to be applied to the extremities of the object to be measured, the dots serving as points, the distance between which was to be ascertained.\n\nIn order to keep the brass pieces in their proper position, and at the same time to ensure, in every case, an equal pressure, two springs were made to slide along a mahogany rule, divided into inches. These springs projected nearly at right angles from the rule, and being set at the required distance from each other, retained by their pressure the brass pieces steadily in the situation in which they were placed.\n\nThe micrometer microscope used on this occasion, differed essentially from that which is commonly employed. The microscope itself was carried along by the micrometer screw, instead of the motion being confined to its cross wires.\n\nBy this construction, which was suggested by Dr. Young, no error could arise from the image not being in the same plane with the wires; and it gave me, besides, the advantage of applying an object-glass, of whatever power I pleased, to the microscope, without altering the value of the divisions of the micrometer.\n\nHaving placed the rectangular pieces of brass, with their surfaces in contact, and the sides on which the dots were made in the same plane, they were confined in this position between the springs before described.\n\nThe following observations were then made with the\nCapt. Kater's account of the re-measurement of micrometer microscope to determine the distance between the dots.\n\n| Readings of the Micrometer | Distance between the Dots |\n|---------------------------|--------------------------|\n| Divisions | Divisions |\n| 10 | 314 |\n| 14 | 317.5 |\n| 13 | 316.5 |\n| 4.5 | 309 |\n| 8.4 | 388 |\n| 8.5 | 389 |\n| 9.5 | 314 |\n| Mean | 304 |\n\nThe value of one division of the micrometer was found by a number of trials to be \\(0.0009758\\) of an inch; the distance between the dots is therefore equal to \\(0.0296582\\) of an inch.\n\nFor a particular description of the cube, sphere, and cylinder, I shall beg leave to refer the reader to Sir George Shuckburgh's paper in the Philosophical Transactions for 1798; and for the correction of some errors in computation, to a paper by J. Fletcher, Esq. given in the 4th vol. of Nicholson's Journal, 8vo.\n\nThe letters used in the following detail, indicate the same parts as in Sir George Shuckburgh's paper. The letters and lines made by Sir George Shuckburgh on the cube, sphere, and cylinder, in black lead pencil, still remained, and afforded the means of examining each step in succession.\n\nGreat care was taken by leaving the apparatus together more than 24 hours, and by other precautions, to guard against errors which might arise from difference of temperature; and the same portions of Sir George Shuckburgh's standard scale were used, as were employed by himself.\nThe microscopes were attached to a strong frame of well seasoned wood, and were transferred from the dots to the scale at each reading.\n\nMeasurement of the cube.\n\nThe brass pieces being properly placed, the excess of the distance between the dots and 5 inches, taken upon the standard scale between 27 and 32, was measured by the micrometer. This being added to 5 inches, and .0296582 subtracted, we have the length of the side of the cube.\n\n| Side 1. (the top.) | Reading of the Micrometer at the Scale. | Dots. | Difference. | Distance between the Dots in Inches. | Length of the side of the Cube in Inches. | Mean. |\n|--------------------|----------------------------------------|-------|-------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|------|\n| | | | | | | |\n| 22 | a to b | 217 | 195 | 5.0190242 | 4.9893660 | |\n| | a to c | 217 | 195 | 5.0190242 | 4.9893660 | |\n| | c to d | 220 | 198 | 5.0193169 | 4.9897687 | |\n| | b to d | 212 | 190 | 5.0185364 | 4.9888782 | |\n\n| Side 2. (the bottom.) | Reading of the Micrometer at the Scale. | Dots. | Difference. | Distance between the Dots in Inches. | Length of the side of the Cube in Inches. | Mean. |\n|-----------------------|----------------------------------------|-------|-------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|------|\n| | | | | | | |\n| 22 | a to b | 220.6 | 198.6 | 5.0193754 | 4.9897172 | |\n| | a to c | 221 | 198 | 5.0193169 | 4.9896587 | |\n| | c to d | 215 | 193 | 5.0188291 | 4.9891709 | |\n| | b to d | 207.5 | 189.7 | 5.0185071 | 4.9888489 | |\n\nHeight from side 1 to side 2.\n\n| | Reading of the Micrometer at the Scale. | Dots. | Difference. | Distance between the Dots in Inches. | Length of the side of the Cube in Inches. | Mean. |\n|----------------------|----------------------------------------|-------|-------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|------|\n| | | | | | | |\n| 18.2 | a to a | 211 | 192.8 | 5.0188095 | 4.9891513 | |\n| | b to b | 210 | 191 | 5.0186340 | 4.9889758 | |\n| | c to c | 214 | 195 | 5.0190242 | 4.9893660 | |\n| | d to d | 209 | 191 | 5.0186340 | 4.9889768 | |\n\nTaking the mean of the above three means for the true length of the side of the cube, we have its content 124.1969 inches.\nCapt. KATER's account of the re-measurement of\n\nMeasurement of the cylinder.\n\nEach of the ends of the cylinder was crossed by Sir G. SHUCKBURGH by two diameters, the extremities of which were connected by lines drawn parallel to its axis. These lines, as well as the letters indicating their terminations, were distinctly visible.\n\nLength of the cylinder.\n\nThe brass pieces being properly arranged, the excess of the distance between the dots and 6 inches, taken upon the scale between 52.1 and 58.1 was measured, which being added to 6 inches, and .0296582 deducted, we obtain the length of the cylinder.\n\n| Reading of the Micrometer at the Scale | Dots | Difference | Distance between the Dots in Inches | Length of the Cylinder in Inches | Mean |\n|----------------------------------------|------|------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------|------|\n| 3.2 | a to a | 264.5 | 6.0254925 | 5.9958343 | 5.99619 |\n| | b to b | 267.3 | 6.0260973 | 5.9964391 | |\n| 3 | c to c | 270.5 | 6.0260485 | 5.9963903 | |\n| 3 | d to d | 267 | 6.0257558 | 5.9960976 | |\n| 5.5 | a to a | 263.5 | 6.0251705 | 5.9955123 | 5.99590 |\n| | b to b | 266.8 | 6.0260290 | 5.9963708 | |\n| 3.2 | c to c | 268 | 6.0255120 | 5.9958538 | |\n| 6.5 | d to d | 261.5 | 6.0255120 | 5.9958538 | |\n| 3.5 | a to a | 260 | 6.0252681 | 5.9956099 | 5.99590 |\n| | b to b | 265 | 6.0258534 | 5.9961952 | |\n| 1 | c to c | 264 | 6.0257558 | 5.9960976 | |\n| 0 | d to d | 261 | 6.0253656 | 5.9957074 | |\n\nThe mean of these three means being taken, we have 5.99600 for the length of the cylinder.\nDiameter of the cylinder.\n\nThe brass pieces were most carefully placed, so that the dots were precisely in the direction of the diameters, and the surfaces tangents to the circumference. The distance between the dots was then compared with 4 inches on the scale, from 54 to 58, and the diameter obtained in the manner before described.\n\nCylinder. (Diameter.)\n\nEnd 1.\n\n| Readings of the Micrometer at the | Difference | Distance between the Dots in Inches. | Diameter of the Cylinder in Inches. | Mean |\n|-----------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------|------|\n| Scale. | Dots. | | | |\n| 40 | a to b | 273.7 | 4.0267022 | 3.9972050 |\n| | c to d | | | 3.99721 |\n| 41 | 318 | 277 | 4.0270242 | 3.9973660 |\n| | | | | |\n\nEnd 2.\n\n| Scale. | Dots. | Difference | Distance between the Dots in Inches. | Diameter of the Cylinder in Inches. | Mean |\n|-----------------------------------|------------|------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------|------|\n| 41 | a to b | 272 | 4.0265363 | 3.9968781 | 3.99703 |\n| | c to d | 275.2 | 4.0268485 | 3.9971903 | |\n\nThe mean of these means gives 3.99712 for the diameter of the cylinder.\n\nOn a subsequent day I repeated the measurement of the diameter, with the following results:\nCapt. KATER's account of the re-measurement of\n\nCylinder. (Diameter.)\n\nEnd 1.\n\n| Reading of the Micrometer at the Scale | Dots | Difference | Distance between the Dots in Inches | Diameter of the Cylinder in Inches | Mean |\n|----------------------------------------|------|------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|------|\n| | | | | | |\n| 42.6 | a to b | 316.5 | 273.9 | 4.02672168 | 3.9970635 |\n| | c to d | 316.5 | | | 3.99702 |\n| 43.4 | a to b | 317.7 | 274.7 | 4.02679973 | 3.9971415 |\n| | c to d | 319 | 277 | 4.02702412 | 3.9973669 |\n| | | | | | 3.99725 |\n\nEnd 2.\n\nThe mean of these measurements scarcely differs from that of the former. We have then the diameter of the cylinder,\n\nby the 1st measurement - 3.99712\nby the 2nd, - - - 3.99714\nMean - 3.99713\n\nThe length being 5.99600, and the diameter 3.99713, the capacity of the cylinder will be 75,2398 inches.\n\nMeasurement of the sphere.\n\nOn referring to Sir GEORGE SHUCKBURGH's account, it will be seen, that for the measurement of the sphere, a brass square was employed, the side of which was a very little longer than the diameter of the sphere. The sphere being placed within the square, and properly supported, a micro-\nmeter screw, which passed through one of the sides of the square, was brought in contact with the diameter of the sphere, and the reading of the micrometer head noted. The sphere being then removed, a brass rule of known length was put in its place, and the micrometer screw being brought in contact with the end of the rule, the difference between its length and the diameter of the sphere was obtained, from which the latter could, of course, be readily determined.\n\nSir GEORGE SHUCKBURGH had drawn three great circles in pencil upon the sphere, which, as well as the letters designating their intersections, remained perfect.\n\nHaving arranged the apparatus, the following measurements of the diameter of the sphere were taken, two of which may be termed equatorial, and the third polar, every precaution being used to prevent errors arising from difference of temperature.\n\n| Diameter of the Sphere | Readings of the Micrometer |\n|------------------------|----------------------------|\n| A to B | 37 |\n| C to D | 38.5 |\n| E to F | 40 |\n\n\\[ \\{ 38.5 \\text{ mean.} \\]\n\nThe rule being now placed in the square, the following were the readings of the micrometer on different trials.\n\n\\[ \\begin{align*}\n51.5 \\\\\n51.5 \\\\\n51 \\\\\n51.3 \\\\\n\\end{align*} \\]\n\n\\[ \\{ 51.33 \\text{ mean.} \\]\n\nHence, the diameter of the sphere exceeds the rule 12.83 divisions.\n\nMDCCCXXI.\nCapt. Kater's account of the re-measurement of\n\nSecond trial.\n\n| Diameter of the Sphere | Readings of the Micrometer |\n|------------------------|----------------------------|\n| A to B | 38 |\n| C to D | 39.2 |\n| E to F | 39.8 |\n\n{39 mean.\n\nThe reading of the micrometer when the rule was placed in the square was 51.3; the diameter of the sphere, therefore, exceeds the rule 12.3 divisions.\n\nThird trial.\n\n| Diameter of the Sphere | Readings of the Micrometer |\n|------------------------|----------------------------|\n| A to B | 38 |\n| C to D | 38.3 |\n| E to F | 39 |\n\n{38.43 mean.\n\nThe readings of the micrometer when the rule was placed in the square were\n\n\\[ \\begin{align*}\n51.7 \\\\\n51.3 \\\\\n51.5 \\\\\n50.5\n\\end{align*} \\]\n\n{51.25 mean.\n\nBy this last trial, the diameter of the sphere exceeds the rule 12.82 divisions.\nBy the 1st trial the diameter of the sphere exceeded the length of the rule - - - 12.83\nBy the 2nd - - - - 12.30\nBy the 3rd - - - - 12.82\n\nMean 12.65\n\nwhich converted into inches, gives 0.0012281 for the excess of the diameter of the sphere above the length of the rule.\n\nLength of the brass rule.\n\nThe brass rule was laid upon the standard scale, where it remained for two days before the measurement was made, in order that it might acquire the same temperature. The rectangular pieces of brass were then applied to its extremities, and the distance between the dots compared with the distance from 26 to 32 inches upon the scale, in the manner which has been before described.\n\n| Scale | Dots | Difference, deducting 304 divisions |\n|-------|--------|-----------------------------------|\n| 25 | 396 | 67 |\n| 24 | 393.5 | 65.5 |\n| 23 | 391.7 | 64.7 |\n| 21 | 391 | 66 |\n| 20.5 | 389.5 | 65 |\n| 21 | 388.4 | 63.4 |\n\nMean 65.3 = 0.0063609 of an inch.\n\n* The distance between the Dots. See page 318.\nThe length of the brass rule from this appears to be 6,0063609 inches, which added to ,0012281, gives 6,00759 inches for the diameter of the sphere; whence we have its solid content 113,5264 inches.\n\nIt may now be useful to collect under one view the data furnished by Sir GEORGE SHUCKBURGH’s experiments, and by the preceding measurements.\n\n| Contents in Inches at 62° | Weight in Air, Grains. | Temp. of the Air. | Barom. Inches. | Weight of an equal bulk of Water, Grains. | Temperature when weighed in Water. |\n|--------------------------|------------------------|------------------|---------------|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|\n| Cube | 124,1969 | 32084.82 | 62 | 29.00 | 31381.79 |\n| Cylinder | 75,2398 | 21560.05 | 62 | 29.00 | 19006.83 |\n| Sphere | 113,5264 | 28722.64 | 67 | 29.74 | 28673.51 |\n\nFrom these data the weight of a cubic inch of distilled water in a vacuum at 62°, deduced from the cube, appears to be 252,907 of Sir G. SHUCKBURGH’s grains.\n\nFrom the cylinder 252,851\n\nAnd from the sphere 252,907\n\nThe mean of which is 252,888\n\nwhich is equal to 252,722 grains of the Parliamentary Standard.\n\nIt is not my intention to enter into a detail of the various corrections necessary in the computation of the preceding results, as they may be found in the Appendix to the Third Report of the Commissioners of Weights and Measures.\n\nLondon,\nMarch, 1821.", "source": "olmocr", "added": "2026-01-12", "created": "2026-01-12", "metadata": { "Source-File": "/home/jic823/projects/def-jic823/royalsociety/pdfs/107621.pdf", "olmocr-version": "0.3.4", "pdf-total-pages": 12, "total-input-tokens": 19000, "total-output-tokens": 5514, "total-fallback-pages": 0 }, "attributes": { "pdf_page_numbers": [ [ 0, 0, 1 ], [ 0, 1605, 2 ], [ 1605, 3325, 3 ], [ 3325, 5142, 4 ], [ 5142, 9414, 5 ], [ 9414, 12109, 6 ], [ 12109, 14187, 7 ], [ 14187, 16049, 8 ], [ 16049, 17523, 9 ], [ 17523, 18574, 10 ], [ 18574, 19780, 11 ], [ 19780, 21523, 12 ] ], "primary_language": [ "en", "en", "en", "en", "en", "en", "en", "en", "en", "en", "en", "en" ], "is_rotation_valid": [ true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true, true ], "rotation_correction": [ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ], "is_table": [ false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false ], "is_diagram": [ false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false, false ] }, "jstor_metadata": { "identifier": "jstor-107621", "title": "An Account of the Re-Measurement of the Cube, Cylinder, and Sphere, Used by the Late Sir George Shuckburgh Evelyn, in His Enquiries Respecting a Standard of Weights and Measures", "authors": "Henry Kater", "year": 1821, "volume": "111", "journal": "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London", "page_count": 12, "jstor_url": "https://www.jstor.org/stable/107621" } }