Census boundary evidence
Fairford & Posen — 1891 census geography (MB)
This page identifies a census boundary representation. Source-table records below retain their own reporting-unit identity and geographic qualifications.
- Map snapshot identifier
- MB006004_1891
- Source boundary identifier
- MB006004
- Census vintage
- 1891
- Source label
- Fairford & Posen
- Province code
- MB
- District label
- Lisgar
- Level
- csd
- Representation class
- E93_Presence
Census continuity group: Fairford & Posen
TCP UID: MB006004
Census source records
No source row has a supported or candidate endpoint here in the current assessment. This does not mean the population was zero.
Boundary intersections across censuses
These are computed polygon intersections in the equal-area CRS ESRI:102001. Fractions describe the area of the earlier and later polygons, respectively. They do not establish historical succession, and population has not been apportioned by area. All positive intersections are retained, including very small contributions.
| Other census representation | Years (earlier → later) | Overlap (m²) | Fraction of earlier area | Fraction of later area | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Eastern · 1881 | 1881 → 1891 | 24969542948.928078 | 0.38518848956717344 | 0.9999999999603983 | LATER_WITHIN_EARLIERHistorical succession verified: False |
| North Western · 1881 | 1881 → 1891 | 0.9888503677211702 | 2.1104735966804732e-11 | 3.96022614312394e-11 | PARTIAL_OVERLAPHistorical succession verified: False |
| Unorganized Territory—Territoire non-organisé · 1901 | 1891 → 1901 | 0.006692774201713692 | 2.6803751334727424e-13 | 1.055879888528868e-12 | PARTIAL_OVERLAPHistorical succession verified: False |
| Posen · 1901 | 1891 → 1901 | 2706829345.3183136 | 0.10840524196808819 | 1.0000000000000002 | LATER_WITHIN_EARLIERHistorical succession verified: False |
| Unorganized Territory—Territoire non-organisé · 1901 | 1891 → 1901 | 22262713604.591915 | 0.8915947580316441 | 0.3192688138833637 | PARTIAL_OVERLAPHistorical succession verified: False |